There can now be no possible harm in telling this poor creature’s
story. Reason enough there has been till now, ever since Madison’s
administration went out in 1817, for very strict secrecy, the secrecy
of honor itself, among the gentlemen of the navy who have had Nolan
in successive charge. And certainly it speaks well for the _esprit de
corps_ of the profession, and the personal honor of its members, that to
the press this man’s story has been wholly unknown—and, I think, to the
country at large also. I have reason to think, from some investigations
I made in the Naval Archives when I was attached to the Bureau of
Construction, that every official report relating to him was burned when
Ross burned the public buildings at Washington. One of the Tuckers, or
possibly one of the Watsons, had Nolan in charge at the end of the war;
and when, on returning from his cruise, he reported at Washington to one
of the Crowninshields—who was in the Navy Department when he came home—he
found that the Department ignored the whole business. Whether they really
knew nothing about it or whether it was a “_Non mi ricordo_” determined
on as a piece of policy, I do not know.
But this I do know, that since 1817, and possibly before, no naval
officer has mentioned Nolan in his report of a cruise.
But, as I say, there is no need for secrecy any longer. And now the poor
creature is dead, it seems to me worth while to tell a little of his
story, by way of showing young Americans of to-day what it is to be A MAN
WITHOUT A COUNTRY.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account