Germany -- Politics and government -- 1888-1918; William II, German Emperor, 1859-1941; World War, 1914-1918
Had we ever had warlike intentions we should have struck the blow
in 1900, when England's hands were tied by the Boer War, Russia's
by the Japanese War, at which time almost certain victory beckoned
us. In any event, we assuredly would not have singled out the year
1914, when we were confronted by a compact, overwhelmingly superior
foe. Also, every impartial man must acknowledge to himself that
Germany could expect nothing from the war, whereas our enemies
hoped to obtain from it the complete realization of the aims which
they had based, long since, upon our annihilation.
The fact that my zealous efforts and those of my Government
were concentrated, during the critical July and August days of
1914, upon maintaining world peace is being proved more and
more conclusively by the most recent literary and documentary
publications in Germany, and, most especially, in the enemy
countries. The most effective proof thereof is Sazonoff's
statement: "The German Emperor's love of peace is a guarantee to
us that we ourselves can decide upon the moment of war." What
further proof of our innocence is needed? The above means that the
intention existed to make an attack upon one who was absolutely
unsuspecting.
CALLS ACCUSATION FUTILE
God is my witness that I, in order to avoid war, went to the
uttermost limit compatible with responsibility for the security and
inviolability of my dear fatherland.
It is futile to accuse Germany of war guilt. To-day there is no
longer any doubt that not Germany, but the alliance of her foes,
prepared the war according to a definite plan, and intentionally
caused it.
For the purpose of concealing this, the allied enemies extorted
the false "admission of guilt" from Germany in the shameful
Peace Treaty and demanded that I _be produced before a hostile
tribunal_. You, my dear Field Marshal, know me too well not to be
aware that no sacrifice for my beloved fatherland is too great for
me. Nevertheless, a _tribunal in which the enemy alliance would
be at once plaintiff and judge would be not an organ of justice,
but an instrument of political arbitrariness, and would serve
only, through the sentence which would inevitably be passed upon
me, to justify subsequently the unprecedented peace conditions
imposed upon us_. Therefore, the enemy's demand naturally had to be
rejected by me.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account