The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
While he was seated on the cushion of authority (_riyásat_), God opened
to him the door of this mystery (_Ṣúfiism_) and bestowed on him the
crown of miracles. He spoke eloquently and discoursed with sublimity on
annihilation and subsistence (_faná ú baqá_). The Grand Shaykh, Abú
Sa`íd, said: “I was led to the court (of God) by the way of servantship
(_bandagí_), but Khwája Muẕaffar was conducted thither by the way of
lordship and dominion (_khwájagí_),” i.e. “I attained contemplation
(_musháhadat_) by means of self-mortification (_mujáhadat_), whereas he
came from contemplation to self-mortification”. I have heard that he
said: “That which great mystics have discovered by traversing deserts
and wildernesses I have gained in the seat of power and pre-eminence
(_bálish ú ṣadr_).” Some foolish and conceited persons have attributed
this saying of his to arrogance, but it is never arrogant to declare
one’s true state, especially when the speaker is a spiritualist. At the
present time Muẕaffar has an excellent and honoured successor in Khwája
Aḥmad. One day, when I was in his company, a certain pretender of
Níshápúr happened to use the expression: “He becomes annihilated and
then becomes subsistent.” Khwája Muẕaffar said: “How can subsistence
(_baqá_) be predicated of annihilation (_faná_)? Annihilation means
‘not-being’, while subsistence refers to ‘being’: each term negates the
other. We know what annihilation is, but when it is not, if it becomes
‘being’, its identity (_`ayn_) is lost. Essences are not capable of
annihilation. Attributes, however, can be annihilated, and so can
secondary causes. Therefore, when attributes and secondary causes are
annihilated, the Object invested with attributes and the Author of
secondary causes continues to subsist: His essence does not admit of
annihilation.” I do not recollect the precise words in which Muẕaffar
expressed his meaning, but this was the purport of them. Now I will
explain more clearly what he intended, in order that it may be more
generally understood. A man’s will (_ikhtiyár_) is an attribute of
himself, and he is veiled by his will from the will of God. Therefore a
man’s attributes veil him from God. Necessarily, the Divine will is
eternal and the human will phenomenal, and what is eternal cannot be
annihilated. When the Divine will in regard to a man becomes subsistent
(_baqá yábad_), his will is annihilated and his personal initiative
disappears. But God knows best.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account