The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on SúfiismHujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Islamic
The Kashf al-mahjúb: The oldest Persian treatise on Súfiism
Hujviri, ‘Ali ibn ‘Usman
Sufism -- Early works to 1800
You must know that, by universal consent of the Ṣúfí Shaykhs, the saints
are at all times and in all circumstances subordinate to the prophets,
whose missions they confirm. The prophets are superior to the saints,
because the end of saintship is only the beginning of prophecy. Every
prophet is a saint, but some saints are not prophets. The prophets are
constantly exempt from the attributes of humanity, while the saints are
so only temporarily; the fleeting state (_ḥál_) of the saint is the
permanent station (_maqám_) of the prophet; and that which to the saints
is a station (_maqám_) is to the prophets a veil (_ḥijáb_). This view is
held unanimously by the Sunní divines and the Ṣúfí mystics, but it is
opposed by a sect of the Ḥashwiyya—the Anthropomorphists (_mujassima_)
of Khurásán—who discourse in a self-contradictory manner concerning the
principles of Unification (_tawḥíd_), and who, although they do not know
the fundamental doctrine of Ṣúfiism, call themselves saints. Saints they
are indeed, but saints of the Devil. They maintain that the saints are
superior to the prophets, and it is a sufficient proof of their error
that they declare an ignoramus to be more excellent than Muḥammad, the
Chosen of God. The same vicious opinion is held by another sect of
Anthropomorphists (_mushabbiha_), who pretend to be Ṣúfís, and admit the
doctrines of the incarnation of God and His descent (into the human
body) by transmigration (_intiqál_), and the division (_tajziya_) of His
essence. I will treat fully of these matters when I give my promised
account of the two reprobated sects (of Ṣúfís). The sects to which I am
now referring claim to be Moslems, but they agree with the Brahmans in
denying special privileges to the prophets; and whoever believes in this
doctrine becomes an infidel. Moreover, the prophets are propagandists
and Imáms, and the saints are their followers, and it is absurd to
suppose that the follower of an Imám is superior to the Imám himself. In
short, the lives, experiences, and spiritual powers of all the saints
together appear as nothing compared with one act of a true prophet,
because the saints are seekers and pilgrims, whereas the prophets have
arrived and have found and have returned with the command to preach and
to convert the people. If any one of the above-mentioned heretics should
urge that an ambassador sent by a king is usually inferior to the person
to whom he is sent, as e.g. Gabriel is inferior to the Apostles, and
that this is against my argument, I reply that an ambassador sent to a
single person should be inferior to him, but when an ambassador is sent
to a large number of persons or to a people, he is superior to them, as
the Apostles are superior to the nations. Therefore one moment of the
prophets is better than the whole life of the saints, because when the
saints reach their goal they tell of contemplation (_musháhadat_) and
obtain release from the veil of humanity (_bashariyyat_), although they
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account