The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
ENQ. What of the latter? How long does the incarnating _Ego_ remain in
the Devachanic state?
THEO. This, we are taught, depends on the degree of spirituality and
the merit or demerit of the last incarnation. The average time is
from ten to fifteen centuries, as I already told you.
ENQ. But why could not this Ego manifest and communicate with mortals
as Spiritualists will have it? What is there to prevent a mother
from communicating with the children she left on earth, a husband
with his wife, and so on? It is a most consoling belief, I must
confess; nor do I wonder that those who believe in it are so
averse to give it up.
THEO. Nor are they forced to, unless they happen to prefer truth to
fiction, however “consoling.” Uncongenial our doctrines may be to
Spiritualists; yet, nothing of what we believe in and teach is
half as selfish and cruel as what they preach.
ENQ. I do not understand you. What is selfish?
THEO. Their doctrine of the return of Spirits, the real “personalities”
as they say; and I will tell you why. If _Devachan_—call it
“paradise” if you like, a “place of bliss and of supreme
felicity,” if it is anything—is such a place (or say _state_),
logic tells us that no sorrow or even a shade of pain can be
experienced therein. “God shall wipe away all the tears from the
eyes” of those in paradise, we read in the book of many promises.
And if the “Spirits of the dead” are enabled to return and see all
that is going on on earth, and especially _in their homes_, what
kind of bliss can be in store for them?
WHY THEOSOPHISTS DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE RETURN OF PURE “SPIRITS.”
ENQ. What do you mean? Why should this interfere with their bliss?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account