The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
[47] The length of this “transfer” depends, however, on the degree of
spirituality in the ex-personality of the disembodied Ego. For those
whose lives were very spiritual this transfer, though gradual, is very
rapid. The time becomes longer with the materialistically inclined.
[48] “Shifting of _Metaphysical terms_” applies here only to the
shifting of their translated equivalents from the Eastern expressions;
for to this day there never existed any such terms in English, every
Theosophist having to coin his own terms to render his thought. It is
nigh time then to settle on some definite nomenclature.
X. ON THE NATURE OF OUR THINKING PRINCIPLE.
THE MYSTERY OF THE EGO.
ENQ. I perceive in the quotation you brought forward a little while ago
from the _Buddhist Catechism_ a discrepancy that I would like
to hear explained. It is there stated that the Skandhas—memory
included—change with every new incarnation. And yet, it is
asserted that the reflection of the past lives, which, we are
told, are entirely made up of Skandhas, “must survive.” At the
present moment I am not quite clear in my mind as to what it is
precisely that survives, and I would like to have it explained.
What is it? Is it only that “reflection,” or those Skandhas, or
always that same Ego, the Manas?
THEO. I have just explained that the reincarnating Principle, or that
which we call the _divine_ man, is indestructible throughout
the life cycle: indestructible as a thinking _Entity_, and
even as an ethereal form. The “reflection” is only the
spiritualised _remembrance_, during the Devachanic period, of
the _ex-personality_, Mr. A. or Mrs. B.—with which the _Ego_
identifies itself during that period. Since the latter is but
the continuation of the earth-life, so to say, the very acme and
pitch, in an unbroken series, of the few happy moments in that
now past existence, the _Ego_ has to identify itself with the
_personal_ consciousness of that life, if anything shall remain of
it.
ENQ. This means that the _Ego_, notwithstanding its divine nature,
passes every such period between two incarnations in a state of
mental obscuration, or temporary insanity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account