The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
THEO. To control and conquer, _through the Higher, the lower self_. To
purify himself inwardly and morally; to fear no one, and nought,
save the tribunal of his own conscience. Never to do a thing by
halves; _i.e._, if he thinks it the right thing to do, let him do
it openly and boldly, and if wrong, never touch it at all. It is
the duty of a Theosophist to lighten his burden by thinking of the
wise aphorism of Epictetus, who says: “Be not diverted from your
duty _by any idle reflection the silly world may make upon you_,
for their censures are not in your power, and consequently should
not be any part of your concern.”
ENQ. But suppose a member of your Society should plead inability to
practice altruism by other people, on the ground that “charity
begins at home”; urging that he is too busy, or too poor, to
benefit mankind or even any of its units—what are your rules in
such a case?
THEO. No man has a right to say that he can do nothing for others, on
any pretext whatever. “By doing the proper duty in the proper
place, a man may make the world his debtor,” says an English
writer. A cup of cold water given in time to a thirsty wayfarer is
a nobler duty and more worth, than a dozen of dinners given away,
out of season, to men who can afford to pay for them. No man who
has not got it in him will ever become a _Theosophist_; but he may
remain a member of our Society all the same. We have no rules by
which we could force any man to become a practical Theosophist, if
he does not desire to be one.
ENQ. Then why does he enter the Society at all?
THEO. That is best known to him who does so. For, here again, we have
no right to pre-judge a person, not even if the voice of a whole
community should be against him, and I may tell you why. In our
day, _vox populi_ (so far as regards the voice of the educated,
at any rate) is no longer _vox dei_, but ever that of prejudice,
of selfish motives, and often simply that of unpopularity. Our
duty is to sow seeds broadcast for the future, and see they are
good; not to stop to enquire _why_ we should do so, and how and
wherefore we are obliged to lose our time, since those who will
reap the harvest in days to come will never be ourselves.
ON CHARITY.
ENQ. How do you Theosophists regard the Christian duty of charity?
THEO. What charity do you mean? Charity of mind, or practical charity
in the physical plane?
ENQ. I mean practical charity, as your idea of Universal brotherhood
would include, of course, charity of mind.
THEO. Then you have in your mind the practical carrying out of the
commandments given by Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount?
ENQ. Precisely so.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account