The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
THEO. I heard of the first; and I also know that, whether legally left
or not, the T.S. has never profited by it, nor have the Founders
ever been officially notified of it. For, as our Society was not
then a chartered body, and thus had no legal existence, the Judge
at the Court of Probate, as we were told, paid no attention to
such legacy and turned over the sum to the heirs. So much for the
first. As for the second, it is quite true. The testator was one
of our devoted Fellows, and willed all he had to the T.S. But when
the President, Colonel Olcott, came to look into the matter, he
found that the testator had children whom he had disinherited for
some family reasons. Therefore, he called a council, and it was
decided that the legacy should be refused, and the moneys passed
to the legal heirs. The Theosophical Society would be untrue to
its name were it to profit by money to which others are entitled
virtually, at any rate on Theosophical principles, if not legally.
ENQ. Again, and I say this on the authority of your own Journal, the
_Theosophist_, there’s a Rajah of India who donated to the Society
25,000 rupees. Have you not thanked him for his great bounty in
the January _Theosophist_ for 1888?
THEO. We have, in these words, “That the thanks of the Convention be
conveyed to H. H. the Maharajah ... for his _promised munificent
gift_ of Rupees 25,000 to the Society’s Fund.” The thanks were
duly conveyed, but the money is still a “promise,” and has never
reached the Headquarters.
ENQ. But surely, if the Maharajah promised and received thanks for his
gift publicly and in print, he will be as good as his promise?
THEO. He may, though the promise is 18 months old. I speak of the
present and not of the future.
ENQ. Then how do you propose to go on?
THEO. So long as the T.S. has a few devoted members willing to work for
it without reward and thanks, so long as a few good Theosophists
support it with occasional donations, so long will it exist, and
nothing can crush it.
ENQ. I have heard many Theosophists speak of a “power behind the
Society” and of certain “Mahatmas,” mentioned also in Mr.
Sinnett’s works, that are said to have founded the Society, to
watch over and protect it.
THEO. You may laugh, but it is so.
THE WORKING STAFF OF THE T.S.
ENQ. These men, I have heard, are great Adepts, Alchemists, and what
not. If, then, they can change lead into gold and make as much
money as they like, besides doing all kinds of miracles at will,
as related in Mr. Sinnett’s “Occult World,” why do not they find
you money, and support the Founders and the Society in comfort?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account