The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
THEO. The Masters do _not_ guide the Society, not even the Founders;
and no one has ever asserted that they did: they only watch
over and protect it. This is amply proved by the fact that no
mistakes have been able to cripple it, and no scandals from
within, nor the most damaging attacks from without, have been
able to overthrow it. The Masters look at the future, not at the
present, and every mistake is so much more accumulated wisdom for
days to come. That other “Master” who sent the man with the five
talents did not tell him how to double them, nor did he prevent
the foolish servant from burying his one talent in the earth.
Each must acquire wisdom by his own experience and merits. The
Christian Churches, who claim a far higher “Master,” the very
Holy Ghost itself, have ever been and are still guilty not only
of “mistakes,” but of a series of bloody crimes throughout the
ages. Yet, no Christian would deny, for all that, his belief in
_that_ “Master,” I suppose? although his existence is far more
_hypothetical_ than that of the Mahatmas; as no one has ever seen
the Holy Ghost, and _his_ guidance of the Church, moreover, their
own ecclesiastical history distinctly contradicts. _Errare humanum
est._ Let us return to our subject.
THE ABUSE OF SACRED NAMES AND TERMS.
ENQ. Then, what I have heard, namely, that many of your Theosophical
writers claim to have been inspired by these Masters, or to have
seen and conversed with them, is not true?
THEO. It may or it may not be true. How can I tell? The burden of proof
rests with them. Some of them, a few—very few, indeed—have
distinctly either _lied_ or were hallucinated when boasting of
such inspiration; others were truly inspired by great Adepts.
The tree is known by its fruits; and as all Theosophists have to
be judged by their deeds and not by what they write or say, so
_all_ Theosophical books must be accepted on their merits, and not
according to any claim to authority which they may put forward.
ENQ. But would Mdme. Blavatsky apply this to her own works—the _Secret
Doctrine_, for instance?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account