The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been FoundedBlavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Religion
The Key to Theosophy: Being a Clear Exposition, in the Form of Question and Answer, of the Ethics, Science and Philosophy for the Study of Which the Theosophical Society Has Been Founded
Blavatsky, H. P. (Helena Petrovna)
Theosophy
THEO. We say that we only allow the presence of the radiation of Spirit
(or Atma) in the astral capsule, and so far only as that spiritual
radiancy is concerned. We say that man and Soul have to conquer
their immortality by ascending towards the unity with which, if
successful, they will be finally linked and into which they are
finally, so to speak, absorbed. The individualization of man after
death depends on the spirit, not on his soul and body. Although
the word “personality,” in the sense in which it is usually
understood, is an absurdity if applied literally to our immortal
essence, still the latter is, as our individual Ego, a distinct
entity, immortal and eternal, _per se_. _It is only in the case
of black magicians or of criminals beyond redemption, criminals
who have been such during a long series of lives_—that the shining
thread, which links the spirit to the _personal_ soul from the
moment of the birth of the child, is violently snapped, and the
disembodied entity becomes divorced from the personal soul, the
latter being annihilated without leaving the smallest impression
of itself on the former. If that union between the lower, or
personal Manas, and the individual reincarnating Ego, has not
been effected during life, then the former is left to share the
fate of the lower animals, to gradually dissolve into ether, and
have its personality annihilated. But even then the Ego remains a
distinct being. It (the spiritual Ego) only loses one Devachanic
state—after that special, and in that case indeed useless,
life—as that idealized _Personality_, and is reincarnated, after
enjoying for a short time its freedom as a planetary spirit,
almost immediately.
ENQ. It is stated in _Isis Unveiled_ that such planetary Spirits or
Angels, “the gods of the Pagans or the Archangels of the
Christians,” will never be men on our planet.
THEO. Quite right. Not “_such_,” but _some_ classes of higher Planetary
Spirits. They will never be men on this planet, because they are
liberated Spirits from a previous, earlier world, and as such they
cannot re-become men on this one. Yet all these will live again in
the next and far higher Mahamanvantara, after this “great Age,”
and “Brahma _pralaya_,” (a little period of 16 figures or so) is
over. For you must have heard, of course, that Eastern philosophy
teaches us that mankind consists of such “Spirits” imprisoned in
human bodies? The difference between animals and men is this: the
former are ensouled by the “principles” _potentially_, the latter
_actually_.[27] Do you understand now the difference?
ENQ. Yes; but this specialisation has been in all ages the
stumbling-block of metaphysicians.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account