THEO. Of course there are; but they have never been recognised by your scientific modern psychologists. To what do you attribute intuition, the “voice of the conscience,” premonitions, vague undefined reminiscences, etc., etc., if not to such communications? Would that the majority of educated men, at least, had the fine spiritual perceptions of Coleridge, who shows how intuitional he is in some of his comments. Hear what he says with respect to the probability that “all thoughts are in themselves imperishable.” “If the intelligent faculty (sudden ‘revivals’ of memory) should be rendered more comprehensive, it would require only a different and appropriate organization, the _body celestial_ instead of the _body terrestrial_, to bring before every human soul _the collective experience of its whole past existence_ (_existences_, rather).” And this _body celestial_ is our Manasic EGO. ON THE REWARD AND PUNISHMENT OF THE EGO. ENQ. I have heard you say that the _Ego_, whatever the life of the person he incarnated in may have been on Earth, is never visited with _post-mortem_ punishment. THEO. Never, save in very exceptional and rare cases of which we will not speak here, as the nature of the “punishment” in no way approaches any of your theological conceptions of damnation. ENQ. But if it is punished in this life for the misdeeds committed in a previous one, then it is this Ego that ought to be rewarded also, whether here, or when disincarnated. THEO. And so it is. If we do not admit of any punishment outside of this earth, it is because the only state the Spiritual Self knows of, hereafter, is that of unalloyed bliss. ENQ. What do you mean?