The Kingdom of ManLankester, E. Ray (Edwin Ray), Sir
History
The Kingdom of Man
Lankester, E. Ray (Edwin Ray), Sir
African trypanosomiasis; Human beings; Science -- History
It was not noticed again until it was re-discovered by Lankester
in 1871, who published the above figure of it in the _Quarterly
Journal of Microscopical Science_ in that year.]
As to the parasite itself--the trypanosome--a long and very
interesting story has now to be told. The first blood-parasite ever
made known to naturalists and medical men was that to which Gruby,
in 1843, gave the name _Trypanosoma sanguinis_. He found it in the
blood of the common frog. We have here reproduced a figure of this
original trypanosome (fig. 49). Similar parasites had been seen, but
not named, in the blood of fishes. These trypanosomes are all very
minute and of a somewhat elongated form, a fair average length being
one thousandth of an inch. They are simple protoplasmic animals,
consisting of one single nucleated corpuscle. The protoplasm is
drawn out at one end of the creature into a motile undulating thread,
and from the point where this joins the body a membranous undulating
crest extends along the greater part of the animal’s length. There
is no mouth, nutrition being effected by the imbibition of soluble
nutrient matter.
After a long interval Gruby’s trypanosome was re-discovered in 1871;
and then several kinds were described in the blood of tortoises,
fishes and birds. In 1878, Dr. Timothy Lewis found a parasite in the
blood of rats, at first in India, and subsequently in the common
rats of London sewers. This parasite resembles a trypanosome in
many respects (fig. 46A), but was very properly given a distinct
name by Savile Kent, who called it “Herpetomonas.” This name has,
however, been dropped; and the rat’s-blood parasite is spoken of as
a trypanosome. It is the _Trypanosoma Lewisii_, and was the first of
these trypanosomes to be found in the blood of a mammalian animal.
The _Trypanosoma Lewisii_ of the rat’s blood seems to do no harm
to the rat, in which it swarms, multiplying itself by longitudinal
fission; nor is it at present known to produce any trouble in other
animals when transferred to their blood. Similarly, the frog’s
trypanosome seems to exist innocently in the frog’s blood.
The next trypanosome discovered (1880) was, however found in the
blood of camels, horses, and cattle suffering from a deadly disease
known in India by the name “surra.” It is called _Trypanosoma
Evansii_, after the observer who detected it. Trypanosomes now began
to get a bad name, for the next was discovered in animals afflicted
by a North African disease known to French veterinaries as “dourine.”
This trypanosome was called _T. equiperdum_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account