The Kingdom of Promise and ProphecyWhiteside, Robertson L.
Religion
The Kingdom of Promise and Prophecy
Whiteside, Robertson L.
Bible -- Prophecies
The image was then smitten upon the feet. The wound was mortal. The
tyrant that had governed the world from the days of Nebuchadnezzar
till that hour was slain. His spirit was subdued, and his whole
physical organization, consisting of gold, and silver, and brass, and
iron, and clay, was then broken into fragments.
Since that time Charlemagne, Napoleon, and many others, have attempted
to revive the spirit and reunite the scattered fragments of this
fallen image. But all such attempts have been in vain.... It is true,
the spirit of war still exists: blood is often shed for the most
trivial causes. But let any prince or potentate now attempt to revive
the spirit of this fallen image; let him attempt, like Nebuchadnezzar,
Cyrus, Alexander, and Caesar, to subdue the world, and to govern it on
the principle that “might makes right;” and if not treated as a maniac
by his own subjects, he will, at least, find arrayed against him the
combined powers of Christendom.
In view of what happened to the Kaiser when he tried to conquer the
world, the last statement of Brother Milligan looks almost like
prophecy. But it was not a prophecy, but merely a statement based on
Daniel’s interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream.
I invite the future-kingdom advocates to consider the following:
1. The image, as it stood before Nebuchadnezzar, represented four world
empires. That is, of course, admitted.
2. The kingdom of God was to be set up while that image stood, and was
to destroy the image. On that point no one can mistake what Daniel says.
3. That image has been destroyed—there has not been a world empire since
the days of Rome.
4. It is certain, therefore, that the kingdom of God has been
established, and that the principles of that kingdom have broken down
and destroyed world empires.
It is a pity that a man will become so obsessed with a speculative idea
as to say that the image has been destroyed, but the kingdom of God had
nothing to do with its destruction. To me it looks like a flat denial of
what Daniel says.
A LEADING DOCTRINE OF THIS CURRENT REFORMATION
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account