The Knickerbocker, Vol. 22, No. 2, August 1843Various
General
The Knickerbocker, Vol. 22, No. 2, August 1843
Various
Periodicals
RELIGIOUS or sectarian controversy is foreign to the purpose of the
KNICKERBOCKER; yet we could not decline the calm consideration of
facts brought forward to correct alleged misstatements. 'If,' says
the writer, 'N. S. D.' wishes information on a subject with which
he seems to be unacquainted, I should like to refer him to works
wherein he may find the original documents.' For our own part, we
think, as we have already partly intimated, that 'the less said the
better' touching the treatment of the Quakers and 'others of the
Non-elect' by the New-England Puritans. WASHINGTON IRVING has driven
a long nail home on this theme: 'The zeal of these good people to
maintain their rights and privileges unimpaired, betrayed them into
errors, which it is easier to pardon than defend. Having served a
regular apprenticeship in the school of persecution, it behooved
them to show that they had become proficients in the art. They
accordingly employed their leisure hours in banishing, scourging,
or hanging, divers heretical Papists, Quakers, and Anabaptists, for
daring to abuse the 'liberty of conscience,' which they now clearly
proved to imply nothing more than that every man should think as he
pleased in matters of religion, _provided_ he thought _right_; for
otherwise it would be giving a latitude to damnable heresies. Now
as they were perfectly convinced that they alone thought right, it
consequently followed that whoever thought differently from them,
thought wrong; and whoever thought wrong, and obstinately persisted
in not being convinced and converted, was a flagrant violator of
the inestimable liberty of conscience, and a corrupt and infectious
member of the body politic, and deserved to be lopped off and cast
into the fire!' * * * WE are indebted to a most kind correspondent
for the following excerpt from his note-book. It is an extract made
many years ago from some author, whose name and that of his work
our friend has alike forgotten. How many just such thoughtless,
rattle-brained, _aimless_ talkers have we encountered! We rather
like the practice of an old friend of ours in this regard! He makes
it a point, he says, never to _inquire_ after any body!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account