Challenger, Professor (Fictitious character) -- Fiction; Spiritualism -- Fiction
Malone was bound in honour not to speak of love to Enid Challenger, but
looks can speak, and so their communications had not broken down
completely. In all other ways he adhered closely to the agreement,
though the situation was a difficult one. It was the more difficult
since he was a constant visitor to the Professor, and now that the
irritation of the debate was over, a very welcome one. The one object of
Malone’s life was to get the great man’s sympathetic consideration of
those psychic subjects which had gained such a hold upon himself. This
he pursued with assiduity, but also with great caution, for he knew that
the lava was thin and that a fiery explosion was always possible. Once
or twice it came and caused Malone to drop the subject for a week or two
until the ground seemed a little more firm.
Malone developed a remarkable cunning in his approaches. One favourite
device was to consult Challenger upon some scientific point--on the
zoological importance of the Straits of Banda, for example, or the
Insects of the Malay Archipelago, and lead him on until Challenger in
due course would explain that our knowledge on the point was due to
Alfred Russel Wallace. “Oh, really! To Wallace the Spiritualist!” Malone
would say in an innocent voice, on which Challenger would glare and
change the topic.
Sometimes it was Lodge that Malone would use as a trap. “I suppose you
think highly of him.”
“The first brain in Europe,” said Challenger.
“He is the greatest authority on ether, is he not?”
“Undoubtedly.”
“Of course, I only know him by his psychic works.”
Challenger would shut up like a clam. Then Malone would wait a few days
and remark casually: “Have you ever met Lombroso!”
“Yes, at the Congress at Milan.”
“I have been reading a book of his.”
“Criminology, I presume?”
“No, it was called ‘After Death--What?’”
“I have not heard of it.”
“It discusses the psychic question.”
“Ah, a man of Lombroso’s penetrating brain would make short work of the
fallacies of these charlatans.”
“No, it is written to support them.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account