The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monumentsGarstang, John
History
The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monuments
Garstang, John
Hittites; Turkey -- Antiquities
The same doubt does not exist, however, in regard to an inscription from
Bey-Keui, which is a definite trace of the Hittites in the west. The
monument is a dressed block of limestone, dug by Professor Ramsay[382]
out of a mound at the entrance to a glen. The hieroglyphs are in relief,
and on the portion of the stone preserved were arranged in rows, of which
two partly remain. The whole was surrounded by a plain border.[383] From
the published copy two or three of the signs may be readily recognised
as distinctively Hittite. The position of the monument has thus a great
interest amid the paucity of evidence in the west.
Those monuments which tell of the Hittite influence in the extreme west
are found on the mountains of Sipylus and Tmolus, not far in either
case from Smyrna. The river Hermus before entering the sea flows about
a mile distant on the northern side of Mount Sipylus. On the other bank
there stretches out a considerable expanse of highly fertile plain. The
road and railway pass between the river and the mountain, and from them
the famous sculpture may be plainly seen. It is several hundred feet
up the slope, involving a sharp climb up the accumulated débris and
soil at the foot of the cliff. Above, the cliffs rise sheer and almost
precipitous.[384]
The monument occupies a recess specially prepared, about forty feet in
height, while the figure itself is over thirty feet high. This gigantic
sculpture, perhaps on account of its accessibility, has been more
noticed in writings, ancient and modern, than any other. Its present
condition,[385] however, leaves us no chance of forming any new opinion
as to its original meaning and character. Fortunately on both points
there remains little doubt, in spite of a considerable controversy, which
is, however, now no longer of interest. As to its meaning, we are guided
by the studied words of Pausanias,[386] read in the light of modern
information, to believe that it was a rock image of the Mother-goddess;
and as to its character, we may see in its present weathered state the
indications of a sculpture in very high relief, almost indeed in the
round, though not disengaged from the rock, which once represented a
female seated, with her feet presumably upon a stool. The head of the
figure is seemingly inclined forward, and the form of the female bust
may still be recognised. Those who previously may have thought the
carving to represent a bust upon a pedestal were deceived by its present
appearance, for certain hieroglyphs[387] in the recess near the head
attest its Hittite origin: the motive of bust and pedestal finds no
place in the category of Hittite art, while the seated figure of the
Mother-goddess has its counterpart in the Hittite sculptures at Eyuk[388]
and Fraktin.[389] The inscription in question is very fragmentary, though
certain characteristic symbols can be recognised, notably the tip-tilted
shoe and the horned (ram’s) head. ‘It contains,’ writes Professor Sayce,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account