The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monumentsGarstang, John
History
The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monuments
Garstang, John
Hittites; Turkey -- Antiquities
Hereabouts, in the dip between the two forts last described, is the
weathered rock inscription known as Nishan Tash.[486] Descending thence
to the lower ground, following the course of the stream which flows
through the middle of the enclosure, two further rocks arrest attention
by the fact that they have been worked by hand. The first of these is
called the Maiden’s Rock, and has given its Turkish name of Kizlar
Kaya to the stream which passes just below it. Though of considerable
dimensions, this rock, besides being dressed around the sides and
worked down squarely in two places in the body, has been cleanly cut
across the top with the exception of a small table-like protuberance
remaining towards one end. The other, which lies still further down
and nearer to the Lower Palace, has been cleft in two, to form as it
were a passage through it from side to side. It would be unsafe without
evidence to suggest any definite use for these rocks in ancient times,
and it is possible that their peculiarities may have resulted only from
the quarrying of the stone blocks used for the Lower Palace or other
buildings of the site.
[Illustration: PLATE LXI
BOGHAZ-KEUI: THE FORTRESS CALLED YENIJE-KALEH (_See p. 205._)
BOGHAZ-KEUI: REMAINS OF THE LOWER PALACE]
We use the term Lower Palace to designate the foundations made famous
by the visit of Texier,[487] and the later descriptions of Professor
Perrot,[488] in distinction to those more recently discovered by Dr.
Winckler on the Upper Acropolis, where the ruins of four such buildings
were found, of which three were probably palaces and the fourth a
temple.[489] The lower courses of the first-mentioned palace, however,
are visible above the ground, so that its plan may be readily traced
out; and whether to be identified as palace or as a temple, it presents
an interesting study, and a peculiar link between the architecture of
the East and West.[490] As may be seen in our photograph,[491] that
which remains of it is built in large single blocks of stone about four
feet in thickness and averaging twice that measure in length. Its form
is rectangular, with a length just over two hundred and ten feet down
the main axis, and a width of one hundred and twenty-eight feet. Its
chief entrance is in the middle of the southern side, and, passing small
guard-rooms on either hand, it leads into a large central court, around
which are chambers, a double series at the ends and a single series at
the sides. To the north and to the west a passage or corridor intervenes
between the court and the rooms: that on the north seems to have been
entered by an opening opposite the main entrance, and one chamber (across
the passage and to the left) is filled by a large tank or bath of stone.
These portions of the building may be judged to have been residential,
while the front and east wings were devoted to offices of the palace.
There are few further features of the interior obvious to the eye except
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account