The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monumentsGarstang, John
History
The land of the Hittites : $b An account of recent explorations and discoveries in Asia Minor, with descriptions of the Hittite monuments
Garstang, John
Hittites; Turkey -- Antiquities
photograph, that the lower wall was antecedent to the upper, and bearing
in mind the later level, which is best seen in the threshold between the
sphinxes, it is highly improbable that the lower wall remained exposed to
view at the time when the upper one was in use. It was probably already
hidden by débris and ruins. The analogy of the palaces of Boghaz-Keui
is entirely accordant. We are inclined, therefore, to believe that the
two sculptured blocks in question (_x_, _y_), representing scenes of the
chase, belong to the earlier period coeval with the lower wall. However
that may be, the evidence before us tells of two distinct phases in the
history of the Hittite Eyuk: the first when the site was surrounded by a
town wall, possibly with a decorated gateway;[595] the second after the
earlier works had been ruined (like the neighbouring palace of the Hatti
at Boghaz-Keui), and in their place a palace was constructed with its
entrance over the remains of the older gateway. Later in this chapter we
shall find indication in an unplaced corner-stone (_p_) of still a third
building period, to which alternatively the newly found blocks (_x_, _y_)
may possibly be assigned.
[Illustration: PLATE LXXII
EYUK: SCULPTURES DECORATING LEFT FRONTAGE OF PALACE ENTRANCE
(_See pp. 253-261._)]
The sculptures decorating this palatial entrance are of two classes:
there are the great monoliths forming the jambs of the gateway, fashioned
like sphinxes (A, B, C, D), and there are the reliefs with which the
walls of the frontage and the approach-way are adorned. The outer
sphinxes (A, B) are almost identical: each is over seven feet in height,
while the blocks of which they form a part are about ten feet high in
all. The inner sphinxes must have been similar but smaller.[596] Only
the forepart of the sphinx is represented, and that is in bold relief.
The breast and fore legs are those of a large animal; this is generally
supposed to represent a bull,[597] though that on the left has five toes
or claws. There is a bagginess as of pendent flesh between the legs. The
upper part is a human face, surrounded with a wig or head-dress of sorts,
which has the shape of a horse-shoe, ending in front of the shoulders in
a completed outward curve within which is an inner concentric circle. At
the sides of the head this feature comes outwards and forwards like a
hood to protect the ears and neck. It is fitted to the head by a broad
band around the brow; from this there descend in front of the ears two
long attachments to support a collar which forms a band under the chin.
That on the left is plain; but that on the right is ornamented with
three rosettes, each with six hollow loop-like petals. The ears are
human, but large and too low down. The eye-sockets are hollowed as for
insetting the eyes separately. The face is too weathered to preserve much
character; it may be judged to have been full and round, especially in
the upper part of the cheeks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account