[312] Messerschmidt, _C.I.H._ (1906), p. 13. The base of the statue appears to be a survival of the columnar bases of Sinjerli and Sakje-Geuzi (Pl. LXXXII.), in the design of which two sphinxes support the drum of the column upon their backs. In this case the design is modified, but retains striking features surviving from the older prototype. The sphinxes are replaced by lions, in the style of the corner-stone lions of Sinjerli (_Ausgrabungen in Sendschirli_, iii., Pl. XLVII.), and between their fore-parts there appears the figure of a man carved in relief. He is in a crouching attitude, dictated probably by the small space at the sculptor’s disposal; his hands are stretched out to the collars of lions on either side; his face is shown in full, with square-cut ridged beard, and a curl of hair prominent on either side of his head, attached clearly to a wig. His dress is a short fringed tunic and short-sleeved vest; a belt is round his waist, to which a dagger is attached. His legs are turned towards his left; upon his feet there seem to be bands or anklets, possibly to bind on his footgear. Though no shoe is visible, the toes are prominently upturned. It is a striking object. The rim of the drum is not decorated in any way, but on the top there is a large square-cut socket, corresponding to the tongue upon the bottom of the statue. (Orig. Consple. Mus., No. 1519.) [313] By Sir Charles W. Wilson; Wright, _Empire_, etc., p. 57. Ramsay and Hogarth, _Recueil_, etc., xiv. and Pl. IV. _C.I.H._, 1900; Pl. XVIII., and p. 15. [314] Cf. Pls. LXV., LXXI. [315] The name means ‘Lion-stone,’ and is familiar wherever such monuments are found. [316] Ramsay and Hogarth, _loc. cit._ Pl. II., A. [317] See below, p. 297, and _Mitt. a. d. Orient. Samm. Sendschirli_, iii. (Berlin, 1902), Pl. XLVI. Originals in the Berlin Vorderas. Mus., Nos. 2718, 3001. [318] Cf. the lions of Marash and Sakje-Geuzi, Pls. XLII., LXXIX. [319] Sterrett, _Epigraphical Journey_ (1884), p. 299. [320] Ramsay and Hogarth, _Recueil, etc._, xv. p. 30 and Pls. I.-II. [321] G. de Jeraphanion, _Proc. S.B.A._, 1908 (Feb.), p. 42 and Pl. I. For the two photographs before us as we write we are indebted to the members of the American Mission at Cæsarea. [322] Pp. 180, 181. [323] P. 237. [324] Pl. XLVI.; _C.I.H._ (1900), Pl. XXXI. p. 26; _Ibid._ (1906), Pl. XXXI. A and p. 23. Constantinople Museum, No. 1217. [325] Hans Rott, _Kleinasiatische Denkmäler_ (Leipzig, 1908), p. 178, fig. 3; Jeraphanion, _Proc. S.B.A._, xxx. (1908) pp. 43, 44, and Pl. II. [326] Murray’s _Handbook for Asia Minor_, p. 273. [327] Ramsay and Hogarth, _Recueil, etc._, xiv. p. 81, and Pl. VI.; _C.I.H._ (1900), Pl. XXX. and p. 25; Chantre, _Mission en Cappadoce_ (Paris, 1898), Pl. XXIII and p. 125. [328] _Hist. Geog._, pp. 288, 312. The identification probably remains unshaken by the discovery at Tashji. Cf. Strabo, xii. 2-6. The word seems to involve the name TARK.... [329] Pl. XLVII.