The Last Days of the RomanovsSokolov, N. (Nikolai)
History
The Last Days of the Romanovs
Sokolov, N. (Nikolai)
Nicholas II, Emperor of Russia, 1868-1918; Romanov, House of
This same Starynkevich, now an ex-Minister, has lately come out in
another “disclosure.” He has informed the representatives of Jewry that
not a single Jew was concerned in the murder of the Imperial family. It
seems almost incredible, but here is the document. It is a letter from
the Secretary of the Joint Foreign Committee of the Jewish Board of
Deputies and the Anglo-Jewish Association, giving details of an
interview with M. Starynkevich. It says: “the Minister, in a statement
given to me written down with his own hand, and herewith literally
translated, declares that:--
“On the strength of the data of the preliminary inquiry, the course
of which was reported to me every week by the Attorney-General, I
can certify that, among the number of persons proved by the data of
the preliminary inquiry to have been guilty of the assassination of
the late Emperor Nicholas II. and of his family, there was not any
person of Jewish descent.”
The letter proceeds:--
“I put to him the question as to how he explains the fact of
General Knox having sent to the British War Office a report to the
contrary. M. Starynkevich ... said that the Russian military
circles had vehemently asserted from the very outset that the
assassination of the Tsar’s family was the handiwork of the Jews,
and that this point must be established by the inquiry. They
started an investigation of their own, and insisted on the whole
course of their inquiry being left to themselves. The Minister of
Justice had to contend with great difficulties before he obtained
that the inquiry should be carried out by the regular organs of his
department. Even the impartial investigation did not cease to be
hampered by the interference of the military. Thus, when the First
Examining Magistrate, Sergeiev, had failed to discover any trace of
Jewish participation in the crime, these military circles
vociferously protested against him and insinuated that M. Sergeiev
was a Jew himself. This campaign was so violent and persistent that
the Minister of Justice had to discharge M. Sergeiev from the case
and to entrust the further proceedings to another examining
magistrate. His successor (_i.e._, Sokolov) was likewise unable to
discover any trace of Jewish participation in the murder of the
Tsar’s family.”
I have given this “statement” in full to prevent any subsequent
“misapprehensions.” M. Starynkevich’s record is known to the reader. He
shows himself in his written “denial” to be a quibbler. The degree of
“guilt” of the implicated persons had not been fully established in the
initial stages of the inquiry, but they were known to be implicated and
known to be Jews. The names of Yurovsky, Goloshchekin, Safarov, Voikov
are in Sergeiev’s own _procès-verbaux_, and they were perfectly known by
him to be Jews.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account