The Last Days of the RomanovsSokolov, N. (Nikolai)
History
The Last Days of the Romanovs
Sokolov, N. (Nikolai)
Nicholas II, Emperor of Russia, 1868-1918; Romanov, House of
They took their quarters in the lower floor of the house, and had their
meals in the commandant’s room. They were in a privileged position in
comparison with us. I think it would be right to say that we had three
parties: the so-called Letts, the Zlokasoff and Sissert workmen. The
Letts Iourovsky treated as equals. The Sissert workmen he treated a
little better than us, and us worst of all. I account for the difference
in his manner towards the Sissert workmen by the fact that he considered
us as workmen from the Zlokasoff factory who had been discharged
together with Avdeieff. Medvedeff also influenced his attitude. He
ingratiated himself with Iourovsky and Nikoulin and made an effort to
be very affable. That is why they had a better attitude towards the
Sissert workmen.
At the beginning he increased the number of posts. He mounted another
machine gun in the attic of the house and established a post in the rear
yard. This post in the rear yard was number ten, the post by the machine
gun, eleven, and the post in the attic twelve. Duties on posts numbers
one, two and twelve, after the arrival of Iourovsky, were performed
exclusively by Letts.
You ask me why I volunteered to guard the czar? I did not see at that
time anything wrong in doing so. As I told you before, I read a little,
different books. I read party pamphlets and had an idea about the views
of the different parties. For example, I know the difference between the
ideas of the social revolutionists and the Bolsheviki. The former
believe that the peasants are a working-class and the latter consider
them as bourgeoisie and believe that only workmen are real proletarians.
My sympathies were with the Bolsheviki, but I did not believe that the
Bolsheviki could build up by their methods of violence a “good” and
“just” life. I still believe that a “good” and “just” life will exist
only when there are not so many rich and so many poor people as there
are at present; and this will only come when all the population are
educated to the point where they understand that the life they are
leading at present is not the true one. I believed the czar to be the
first capitalist who would always play into the hands of capital and not
into those of the workmen. For this reason I did not want a czar and
thought that he ought to be kept under guard, or at least imprisoned,
until the time when he could be judged by the nation and punished by it
according to his crimes, after deciding: “Was he guilty before his
people, or not?” I thought his imprisonment was necessary for the safety
of the revolution, and if I had known before that he would be killed in
the way he was, I never would have gone to guard him. I believed that he
could be judged only by the whole of Russia, as he was the czar of the
entire Russian nation. All that happened I consider a wicked deed,
“unjust and cruel.” The murder of the rest of his family I consider
still worse. For what reason were his children murdered? I must also
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account