There were, at this time, five parties contending for mastery. Should one
of these appear for the moment to be about to make itself secure in
power, the other four would at once unite to tear the common adversary
from his unstable position. Of these parties, only two were of real
cohesion: the Legitimists and the Bonapartists. The Socialists, the
Moderate Republicans, and the Orleanists were too closely allied in the
past to be friendly in the present. Socialists are noisy, but rarely
clever. A man who in France describes himself as Moderate must not expect
to be popular for any length of time. The Orleanists were only just out
of office. It was scarcely a year since Louis Philippe had died in exile
at Claremont--only three years since he signed his abdication and hurried
across to Newhaven. It was not the turn of the Orleanists.
There is no quarrel so deadly as a family quarrel; no fall so sudden as
that of a house divided against itself. All through the spring and
summer of 1851 France exhibited herself in the eyes of the world a
laughing-stock to her enemies, a thing of pity to those who loved that
great country.
The Republic of 1848 was already a house divided against itself.
Its President, Louis Bonaparte, had been elected for four years. He was,
as the law then stood, not eligible again until after the lapse of
another four years. His party tried to abrogate this law, and failed. "No
matter," they said, "we shall elect him again, and President he shall be,
despite the law."
This was only one of a hundred such clouds, no bigger than a man's hand,
arising at this time on the political horizon. For France was beginning
to wander down that primrose path where a law is only a law so long as it
is convenient.
There was one man, Louis Bonaparte, who kept his head when others lost
that invaluable adjunct; who pushed on doggedly to a set purpose; whose
task was hard even in France, and would have been impossible in any other
country. For it is only in France that ridicule does not kill. And twice
within the last fifteen years--once at Strasbourg, once at Boulogne--he
had made the world hold its sides at the mention of his name, greeting
with the laughter which is imbittered by scorn, a failure damned by
ridicule.
It has been said that Louis Bonaparte never gave serious thought to the
Legitimist party. He had inherited, it would seem, that invaluable
knowledge of men by which his uncle had risen to the greatest throne of
modern times. He knew that a party is never for a moment equal to a Man.
And the Legitimists had no man. They had only the Comte de Chambord.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account