=25. INTERCEPERAT.= _Intercipere_ 'capture' common in Livy (IX 43 3, XXI 1
5, XXVI 51 12, XXXVI 31 10); compare Ammianus XX 7 17 & XX 10 3 'locis
... recuperatis quae olim barbari intercepta retinebant ut propria'.
=26. EREPTAS VICTOR HABEBAT OPES.= Similar phrasing at _Fast_ III 49-51
'hoc ubi cognouit contemptor Amulius aequi / (nam _raptas_ fratri
_uictor habebat opes_), / amne iubet mergi geminos'.
=27. FLVMINEA ... VNDA.= _Flumineus_ does not occur elsewhere in the
_Tristia_ or _Ex Ponto_; _fluminea ... aqua_ at _Fast_ II 46 & 596.
=27. VITELLIVS.= This Vitellius is presumably one of the four sons of
Publius Vitellius, grandfather of the emperor. Suetonius wrote of the
sons, Aulus, Quintus, Publius, and Lucius, that they were 'quattuor
filios amplissimae dignitatis cognomines ac tantum praenominibus
distinctos' (_Vit_ 2 2). Heinsius suggested Aulus (_cos_ AD 32) was the
one here meant, 'nisi ad L. Vitellium patrem [_sc_ principis] referre
mauis'. 'On the general and reasonable assumption', wrote Syme (_HO_
90), 'this is P. Vitellius'. But Suetonius calls P. Vitellius 'Germanici
comes', and he is heard of in 15 assisting Germanicus in a campaign (Tac
_Ann_ I 70 1): it is perhaps more likely that Publius would have been
with Germanicus at the time of the capture of Aegissos, and that another
of the brothers is meant. Certainty is in any case not attainable.
=29. PROGENIES ALTI FORTISSIMA DONNI.= For the phrasing, compare _EP_ II
ix 1-2 'Regia _progenies_, cui nobilitatis origo / nomen in Eumolpi
peruenit usque ['goes back to'], Coty'.
The Donnus here referred to is Vestalis' grandfather (_CIL_ V 7817), or
possibly a more distant ancestor. Vestalis' father, Cottius, became a
client of Augustus; at XV 10 7 Ammianus mentions the worship still
accorded Cottius 'quod iusto moderamine rexerat suos, et ascitus in
societatem rei Romanae quietem genti praestitit sempiternam'. At _Nero_
18 Suetonius mentions as one of the few additions to the empire under
Nero the 'regnum ... Alpium defuncto Cottio'. This Cottius would probably
have been Vestalis' older brother; André is therefore right to infer
that Vestalis 'n'était pas l'héritier du trône, ce qu'Ovide n'aurait pas
manqué de signaler'.
=30. IMPETVS.= _Impetus_ + infinitive usually indicates a mad impulse: the
only other exception in Ovid is _Met_ V 287-88 (one of the Muses
speaking) '_impetus ire fuit_; claudit sua tecta Pyreneus / uimque
parat, quam nos sumptis effugimus alis'.
=31. CONSPICVVS LONGE FVLGENTIBVS ARMIS.= Modelled on _Aen_ XI 769
'_insignis longe_ Phrygiis _fulgebat_ in _armis_'.
=32. FORTIA NE POSSINT FACTA LATERE CAVES.= Vestalis would in any case
have fought bravely; so that his deeds would not pass unnoticed, he led
the attack.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account