Ovid seems to have been best served in exile by those of his friends who
were of no particular eminence. In _Tr_ III iv 3-8 & 43-44 he complains
not only of the treatment he has received from Augustus, but also of the
lack of assistance from those of his friends most in a position to help.
Once Sextus Pompeius had indicated he was willing to be named publicly,
Ovid could not ignore the influence that a man of such position could
bring to bear; hence the number of poems addressed to him in the fourth
book.
Ovid starts the poem with an elaborate assertion of his past and present
desire to mention Pompeius in his verse (1-22), and then briefly
recounts the services Pompeius has rendered to him, and will continue to
render (23-26). The reason he is confident that Pompeius will continue
to assist him is that Pompeius' past assistance has been such that he is
now, in effect, Pompeius' creation, and brings glory to him in the way
that great works of art do for their creators (27-36).
=1. DEDVCTVM.= 'Composed'. _Deducere_ is often used in reference to the
drawing of fibres from the wool on the distaff and the shaping of the
thread (Catullus LXIV 311-14). From this meaning derive the two senses
the word can have when referring to poetry, 'composed' and 'finely spun,
delicate'. The first sense is seen here and at _Tr_ I i 39, _EP_ I v 13,
and at _Tr_ V i 71 'ipse nec emendo, sed ut hic _deducta_ legantur', and
the second at _Ecl_ VI 4-5 'pastorem, Tityre, pinguis / pascere oportet
ouis, _deductum_ dicere carmen', where _deductum ... carmen_ represents
the [Greek: Mousan ... leptaleên] of Callimachus _Aetia_ I 24; Servius
comments on the metaphor from spinning. It has been suggested that _Met_
I 4 'ad mea perpetuum _deducite_ tempora carmen' shows this meaning as
well; see Kenney _Ouidius Prooemians_ 51-52.
Hor _Ep_ II i 225 'tenui deducta poemata filo' stands somewhere between
the two senses.
=2. DEBITOR ... VITAE.= See v 33-36 (Ovid's letter speaking to Pompeius)
'te sibi, cum fugeret, memori solet ore referre / barbariae tutas
exhibuisse uias, / sanguine Bistonium quod non tepefecerit ensem, /
effectum cura pectoris esse tui'. The passage suggests that Pompeius
supplied Ovid with a bodyguard for his journey overland from Tempyra to
Tomis, either in an official capacity--Dessau suggests (_PIR_ P 450)
that Pompeius might have been proconsul of Macedonia--or, more probably,
from his Macedonian estates, for which Dessau and Syme (_HO_ 157) cite
xv 15.
=3. QVI.= Williams' CVI is possibly correct; the line would then refer to
the _titulus_ of the poem in a published text.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account