The last Punic war, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
History
The last Punic war, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.
Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
Tunisia -- History; Tunisia -- History -- French occupation, 1881-1956
Madame Musalli and his dinner-parties at Mustapha’s, he knew to whom he
owed the annoyance and acted accordingly. The French troops had not got
to Tunis before M. De Sancy awoke M. Roustan one morning to say that
Zainzain had offered to tell the secrets of the _Mostakel_ for a
consideration, while Bokhos repaired to Paris to make the best bargain
he could for Signor Pestalozza’s MSS. A short time afterwards he sold
his dossier to a patriotic banker, and it was finally published in the
_Paris_ newspaper, but contained nothing beyond the veriest bathos. The
only result of this department of Signor Maccio’s diplomacy was to
irritate the French, to put money into the pockets of two Levantine
adventurers, and to materially increase for three days the sale of a
Parisian evening journal.
M. Roustan was not inactive during his opponent’s absence in Sicily. By
his advice the parties interested in Tunisian commercial development,
liberally subventioned a large section of the French press, and the
_Agence Havas_ began to throw out _ballons d’essai_. As early as the
12th January the following telegram was circulated in Tunis:—
“PARIS, _11th January_.
“A letter from Algiers to the Havas Agency proves that a French
Protectorate over Tunis is indispensable for the security of the
Algerian frontier. France seeks no annexion, but she will never allow a
rival influence to be established there.”
The _Temps_, commenting on this letter, indicates the services rendered
by France to Tunis, asserts that an uninterrupted protectorate of fifty
years constitutes _ipso facto_ a permanent protectorate, and concludes
with these words,—“He who touches Tunis touches France!” On the 31st
January M. Roustan had a long interview with Muhamed es Sadek. Almost as
soon as they were seated the French _Chargé d’Affaires_ made a most
astounding announcement to the Bey. “Mustapha,” said M. Roustan, “has
been intriguing at Constantinople to succeed you. He has sent £25,000 to
Sheikh Zafar, the Sultan’s _imám_, to get the succession altered, but
the Sultan was so displeased with the proposal that he has decided to
dethrone you in favour of your arch-enemy Kheir-ed-Din. France, your
ancient ally, will protect you; are you prepared to accept her
protection?” The Bey knew the first part of the statement was a
diplomatic falsehood, and so doubted the whole. After a lengthy
conversation he finally declined to alter the _status quo_. “We are all
in the hands of God,” he said, “and if force is to overcome right and
justice, all I can do is to leave my fate and that of Tunis to Him.”
England was not, however, destined to be a mere spectator of the game of
chess between the French and Italian _consuls de combat_. The Enfida
case soon threatened to make her also one of the parties to the dispute.
The story of this fresh phase of the Tunisian question can be told in
few words.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account