The last Punic war, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
History
The last Punic war, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.
Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
Tunisia -- History; Tunisia -- History -- French occupation, 1881-1956
Mr. Levy was put in possession on the 12th January. On the following
day, he left his agents in a house on the estate called the Dar-el-Bey,
and furnished them with a written authority to hold it on his behalf. He
then proceeded to plant trees on different parts of the estate, plough
fields, and perform other acts required by law of an exerciser of pre-
emption in possession. During his absence the agent of the French
Company arrived, accompanied by M. Roustan’s chancelier, a M. Robin, and
an armed dragoman. In vain Mr. Levy’s agents protested, and exhibited
their authority, which had been duly executed by Arab notaries; they
were forcibly ejected from the house. Fortunately, however, for Mr.
Levy, the Arab notaries who accompanied the French party refused to
complete the deeds of sale, on account of Mr. Levy having legally
exercised pre-emption, and this appears to have induced M. Robin to
hesitate before extending his system of forcible ejectments to the
workmen occupying for Mr. Levy the other portions of the estate. Mr.
Reade, the British Agent and Consul-General, entered a vigorous protest
against the conduct of M. Roustan, which had excited universal
indignation throughout the whole European colony. This feeling soon
extended itself to the Tunisian Government and its subjects, for M.
Roustan hastened to announce that he regarded the Enfida also as a
French property, and would admit of no interference on the part of the
local courts, or no application of the local law. Mr. Levy appealed for
aid to Lord Granville, and M. Roustan brought two additional French
ships of war to intimidate the Bey in case of need, as well as to
exercise a salutary influence on the cadi if he endeavoured to assert
his legal authority. As soon as the facts became known in England, the
English press warmly and unanimously advocated Mr. Levy’s appeal for
assistance, and Mr. Montague Guest, M.P., in the House of Commons, and
the Earl De la Warr in the House of Lords, called the attention of the
Government to the conduct of M. Roustan, and the necessity of supporting
the protest of Mr. Reade. Communications passed between the two
Governments, and on the 7th February Sir Charles Dilke informed the
House of Commons “that the English and French Governments had agreed
that the question should be dealt with by the local tribunals, under
whose jurisdiction the matter properly comes,” and Lord Granville made a
similar statement in the House of Lords. Both Mr. Guest and Lord De la
Warr had recently visited Tunis; they were both aware of the system of
terrorism pursued by the French representative towards the Bey; and they
had both carefully inquired into the merits of this particular case. On
it being announced that the French ironclads had been sent to Tunis, Mr.
Guest energetically remonstrated, and two British ships were also sent
there. The French vessels were immediately withdrawn, and the
“Thunderer” and “Decoy” returned to Malta. Mr. Levy was for the time
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account