The last Punic war, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
History
The last Punic war, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.
Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
Tunisia -- History; Tunisia -- History -- French occupation, 1881-1956
I have in a former chapter spoken of the Khamírs and other tribes which
inhabit the neighbourhood of the Algerian frontier. The boundary itself
is tolerably well defined by a line of hills running southwards from
Tabarca. The Arabs on the eastern slope of the range are subjects of the
Bey of Tunis, those on the western owe allegiance to the French
Republic. “I really cannot say,” said M. Panariello, “when I was at La
Galle in September 1881, which of the two gives the most trouble. The
Algerian Arabs are generally the thieves, and the Tunisian the
receivers; they remain good friends as long as they are robbing third
parties, and only quarrel when it comes to a division of the spoil.
These border squabbles have occurred over and over again any time these
thirty years, and nobody cared about them, _till_,” he added, “_it was
convenient to do so_.” If the Tunisian Arabs have sometimes been the
aggressors, scores of cases are on record in which the Algerians have
wantonly violated Tunisian territory, but the Bey of Tunis never thought
of invading Algeria “for the protection of _his_ frontier,” any more
than France could justify the occupation of Belgium by a case of cattle-
lifting having occasioned loss to some French subjects on the confines
of that kingdom.
While Sidi Yusef and M. Panariello were arranging for an opportune
fracas on the borders, M. Roustan was very active at Tunis. Although his
own _entourage_ never contained a single Frenchman, he set in motion a
purely legendary _côterie_ styling itself the French colony. Before the
outbreak of hostilities, there were not more than a score of French
residents of position and respectability in Tunis, and yet throughout
all the recent events, the utterances of half-a-dozen individuals,
headed by the deputy or representative, have been treated in Europe as
if they expressed the wishes, ideas, and political feelings of some
large and influential body of men, having a peculiar knowledge of the
difficulties of the situation, and the largest, if not the only, stake
in the future of the country. About the 20th March an Address was got up
by “the colony,” and presented with a silver cup to M. Roustan. The
former took the extraordinary shape of a sweeping bill of indictment
against the Bey of Tunis. On its publication in Europe by the good
offices of the _Agence Havas_, Muhamed es Sadek (who still believed in a
Christian sense of justice and the amity of nations) hoped to counteract
its effect by a letter to M. Roustan, of which copies were submitted to
the agents of the “friendly powers.”
_“Letter of his Highness the Bey to M. Roustan, Consul-General and
Chargé d’Affaires of France.”_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account