The last Punic war, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
History
The last Punic war, Vol. 1 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.
Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
Tunisia -- History; Tunisia -- History -- French occupation, 1881-1956
The despatches interchanged between M. Waddington and Lord Salisbury are
too well known even to need being quoted from. M. De Blovitz, the Paris
correspondent of the “Times,” who was in Berlin at the time, gives the
following account of the circumstances under which the now historical
fiat of “Take Carthage” went forth from the lips of Prince Bismarck. “It
is hard to say,” writes M. De Blovitz, “how France came to be convinced
that at the Berlin Congress, Prince Bismarck invited M. Waddington to
take Tunis. Probably it was the result of words which were passed from
mouth to mouth, and got exaggerated at every repetition. What the Prince
said was merely one of the sallies he sometimes indulges in, and to
which he himself attaches no importance. He himself told me, ‘On first
seeing Lord Beaconsfield, I said to him, You ought to have an
understanding with Russia instead of thwarting her. You might leave her
free at Constantinople, and yourselves take Egypt, which would
compensate you for your complaisance. France would not be so vexed as
may be imagined, and, in any case, Tunis or Syria might be given her as
an equivalent!’ I took this at the time and still take it for a jest,
but the Prince had previously spoken in the same strain to Lord
Salisbury and M. Waddington. The former made no answer, because Prince
Bismarck was then in the dark as to the Cyprus convention, while M.
Waddington answered, what he afterwards publicly repeated, that France
had no design on Tunis, but could not allow any other European Power to
instal itself there, and thus imperil her Algerian possessions.
Thereupon came the news of the Cyprus convention, on which the French
press began attacking M. Waddington, asserting that the English
occupation of Cyprus was a rebuff for French diplomacy. The Italian
papers were still more excited, and blamed Count Corti for not returning
from the congress with some island in his pocket. This was the starting-
point of the Tunis question in Italy, and of conversations, not only
between Lord Salisbury and M. Waddington, but between M. Waddington and
Count Corti. M. Waddington declared throughout that France had no design
of annexing Tunis, but would not tolerate any European neighbour there.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account