The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
History
The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.
Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
Tunisia -- History; Tunisia -- History -- French occupation, 1881-1956
As to the now defunct Ministry (telegraphed M. De Blowitz on the 10th
November to the _Times_), it might be styled the Roustan Cabinet, or the
“Cabinet des Naïfs.” M. Ferry was simple enough to believe that M.
Gambetta would accept office on the eve of the session, and would be
forced to retain him in his Cabinet. He was simple enough to credit M.
Roustan’s assurances that the subjugation of Tunis would be a military
promenade. He is simple enough himself to believe, or expect the Chamber
to believe, that the Marseilles financiers, from pure patriotism,
rejected a bonus of half a million francs for the sale of the Enfida
property, that France is stronger with Tunis on her hands than without
it, and that expenditure has not been incurred without constitutional
sanction, because the money has not yet been debited against any
Parliamentary vote. M. Saint-Hilaire was simple enough to think Prince
Bismarck egged on France in the Tunis Expedition out of pure
friendliness, and he was simple enough to picture Tunis as about to
become a perfect paradise under French patronage. General Farre is
simple enough to believe, or at least to say, that soldiers do not get
acclimatised in the field, and that the science of war consists in
bringing back one set of raw levies and sending out another. The whole
Cabinet were simple enough to think Parliament would regard the
conclusion of the May Treaty on the eve of re-assembling after Easter,
and the occupation of Kairwán on the eve of the meeting in October, as
pure coincidences, not as theatrical strokes, analogous to an instalment
of a novel, leaving off at a thrilling point. Nobody suspects the late
Ministers of any dishonourable motives. Nobody imagines that they
plunged into the Tunisian hornets’ nest from any complicity in Bourse
speculations. Even their little artifices in accelerating the elections
and meeting Parliament with a bulletin from Kairwán are matters for a
smile rather than for grave reprehension. They have simply been the
dupes of their own sanguineness, and perhaps of the craft of others.
· · · · · · · · · ·
At Tunis, however, M. Roustan was pleased to consider the result of the
vote on M. Gambetta’s order of the day as a personal victory of his own.
Early on the following morning the “approval of the Tunisian Expedition”
was placarded all over the city, and four days later, when the local
Cleopatra returned to Tunis from a visit to Paris, the Bey’s gilded
barge was made ready to convey her to the shore, while eager deputations
represented both the legendary colony and the financial associations,
and the Pro-Bey fondly believed that his position was now secure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account