The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
History
The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.
Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
Tunisia -- History; Tunisia -- History -- French occupation, 1881-1956
“‘The régime changes,’ says George Canning, speaking of France, ‘but the
hereditary character of the French people never alters.’ The French are
Chauvinists now as they were under Henry IV., Louis XIV., Charles X.,
Louis Philippe, and the Napoleons, who, to blind the English, invented
as it suited them that now exploded fiction, ‘L’Empire c’est la paix.’
Let us glance for a moment at Protocol XIII. ‘of the Conference held at
Vienna, April 26th, 1855.’
“Prince Gortschakoff: ‘A territorial stipulation being once guaranteed,
should we not extend it to the most distant points, _as, for instance,
in the case of Tunis_, and make a _casus belli_ of all attacks on the
outlying portions of the Empire?’
“M. Drouyn de Lhuys: ‘I would point out that France not only promises to
respect the independence and integrity of the Ottoman Empire, but has
engaged to cause the principle to be respected by others; as far as I am
concerned, _I see no difficulty in extending to that country (Tunis) the
operation of the Treaty_ I am ready to subscribe.’
“The Baron de Bourquenet: ‘I am of entirely the same opinion as M.
Drouyn de Lhuys.’
“This Protocol was communicated by Her Majesty’s Government to the
Houses of Parliament on the 10th May 1855. It bears the signatures of
the Plenipotentiaries of France, M. Drouyn de Lhuys, and the Baron de
Bourquenet, as well as those of M. le Comte Buol Schauenstein, Baron
Prokesch-Osten, Lord Westmorland, M. de Titoff, Prince Gortschakoff,
Aali Pasha, and Aarif Effendi.
“By this international convention it is evident that France actually
confirmed the obligations which she had already entered into by her
adhesion to the Treaty of London in 1841—obligations which, in the eyes
of every honest man in Europe, were solemnly ratified afterwards at
Paris and Berlin.
“It results, therefore, that the admission of Sir Charles Dilke, as to
the recognition by Europe of the Tunisian Firman of 1871, is actually
based on great international engagements; but it merely confirmed a
state of things existing _ab antiquo_. Is there any record of a Bey of
Tunis _not_ being invested by the Sultan? Did the Sultan obtain from his
Tunisian vassal a contingent of 15,000 men during the war of 1854?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account