The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
History
The last Punic war, Vol. 2 (of 2) : $b Tunis, past and present : with a narrative of the French conquest of the regency.
Broadley, Alexander Meyrick
Tunisia -- History; Tunisia -- History -- French occupation, 1881-1956
The Arabs who a month ago surrounded Kairwán are now on the very
frontiers of Tripoli. Into that country they will ultimately retreat.
Will the Sultan’s troops force back at the point of the bayonet from the
Regency of Tripoli their co-religionists, whose only crime has been to
defend from invasion the Regency of Tunis? Will the French follow their
swiftfooted foes across the boundary-line? Will Mr. Gladstone ask
England to believe in sober seriousness that the Tripolitans have
afforded good ground for French aggression, after the manner of his
assurances about the Khamírs six months ago? Will the so-called European
concert allow the absorption of Tripoli as well as Tunis into the colony
of Algeria? These important questions will soon have to be answered. The
Moslems of Africa await with impatience the verdict of Europe. The fall
and occupation of Kairwán have raised a momentous issue. The interest
excited by this old world city in the minds of the annalist and the
archæologist is undoubtedly great, for within its walls a mine of
unexplored wealth awaits them both; but, for the moment, this interest
is completely eclipsed by that centred in the very grave political
questions which must naturally arise from the presence of a hostile
Christian force in what was once “the camp and ramparts of Islam.”
CHAPTER XXXVIII.
AFTER THE VICTORY.
While the French troops were still around the walls of Kairwán, the
Ministry of M. Ferry formally placed its resignation in the hands of the
President of the Republic. Public opinion in France had of late been so
severely exercised on the Tunisian Question, that even the dramatic
announcement of the well-timed conquest of Kairwán failed to produce any
other effect than ill-concealed hilarity. The unexpected surrender of
the Government deprived the Tunisian debate of its natural interest, and
its excessive dulness was only relieved by the credulous sentimentality
of M. Ferry, the sarcasms of M. Clémenceau, and the unanswerable
criticism of M. Le Faure.
Six months had brought about a remarkable change in French public
opinion, and the very deputies who had cheered M. Ferry’s warlike
utterances in May came only to gibe and jeer at his halting apologies in
November. It was in vain for M. Ferry to strike his breast and declare
that there was “the most perfect accord” between the Bey and the French.
This bold assertion was received with undisguised merriment, and even
created what is technically known as “an incident.” An eye-witness gives
an amusing account of M. Ferry’s perplexities:—
M. FERRY said—I do not see why you should laugh at that. If you were
patriots you should rejoice at it.
DUC DE FELTRE—Certainly, if it were true; but it happens not to be true.
M. FERRY—I beg your pardon; it is absolutely true.
DUC DE FELTRE—Prove it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account