The Law and Medical MenRogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
History
The Law and Medical Men
Rogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
Medical laws and legislation
If one has been induced to enter the partnership through the fraud
or misrepresentation of the other, the party deceived may at his
option avoid the contract. But he should act promptly on discovering
the deception. Where a surgeon was induced to enter into partnership
with, and pay a large premium to another, in consequence of |190|
misrepresentations as to the amount of income derived from the
practice, a dissolution was decreed and a return of part of the
premium [496]; and where a practitioner took a partner and a premium,
and agreed to continue practising for three years, concealing the fact
that he was suffering from a disease which soon carried him off, his
executor was ordered to return part of the premium [497].
Partners are trustees and agents for one another, and must exercise
the most perfect good faith towards one another. One cannot sue the
other for his share of the profits until the accounts have been stated
and settled between them. One medical man cannot, as a rule, bind his
partner by borrowing money, even to pay partnership liabilities, or by
making or drawing promissory notes or bills of exchange; but he may
generally do so by simple contracts, within the scope of the business.
In England, it appears that there is nothing illegal in the partnership
of a qualified and an unqualified practitioner, and that it will be
sufficient if only one member of the firm be registered [498].
A partnership may be dissolved by mutual agreement, or by the effluxion
of time. A wilful and permanent neglect of business is a ground for
dissolution; so is gross misconduct by a partner in reference to
partnership matters. Immoral conduct materially affecting the business
will be a ground for dissolution; also, insanity, or permanent
incapacity [499]. On a dissolution the partners may separately carry on
the business at any place, unless restrained by agreement. |191|
Sir John Leach considered that in a partnership, between professional
persons, upon the death of one partner the good-will of the business
belonged to the survivor, and that he was not bound to account to the
representatives of the deceased partner for it [500].
A good-will attaches to a professional, as well as to any other kind of
business, and it is and may be the subject of purchase and sale; and
although it is not computable, and the sale of it is not enforceable by
an action for specific performance if it has not been estimated, yet it
does stand on the same footing as any other business, if the parties
have fixed a determinate price upon it, or have provided any other way
of fixing its value [501]. The good-will of a medical man’s business
is an asset of his estate which his representatives can sell, and for
which they must account if it is sold. But it is not clear that the
representatives can be compelled to find a purchaser [502].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account