The Law and Medical MenRogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
History
The Law and Medical Men
Rogers, R. Vashon (Robert Vashon)
Medical laws and legislation
Representations made by a sick person of the nature and effects of the
malady under which he is suffering are receivable as original evidence,
whether made to a physician or to any other; though, if made to a
physician, they are entitled to greater weight than if made to a man
incapable of forming a correct judgment respecting the accuracy of the
statements, from unacquaintance with the symptoms of diseases [236].
When the bodily or mental feelings of a party are to be proved, his
exclamations or expressions indicating present pain or malady are
competent evidence [237]; and |97| the complaints and statements of
the injured party, if made at the very time of the occurrence, are
admissible as _res gestæ_, not only as to the bodily suffering, but
as to the circumstances of the occurrence; and the time in question
is not the time of injury, but the time when it is material to prove
a condition of bodily or mental suffering, and that may be material
for weeks, and perhaps months, after an injury has been inflicted.
The statements are admissible even though made after the commencement
of an action, though this may be a circumstance to detract from the
weight of the evidence of a physician, so far as it was founded on
the statements [238]. But statements or declarations of a sick or
injured person, referring to his state and condition at a time past,
and not furnishing evidence of a present existing malady, are to be
carefully excluded, whether made to an expert or a non-expert [239],
and statements in writing by patients to a medical man, describing
the symptoms of the illness upon which the physician has advised the
patient, are also inadmissible in evidence [240]. It has been said in
Illinois, that as a physician must necessarily, in forming his opinion,
be, to some extent, guided by what the sick person may have told him in
detailing his pains and sufferings, not only the opinion of the expert,
founded in part upon such data, is receivable in evidence, but that he
may state what the patient said in describing his bodily condition, if
said under circumstances which free it from all suspicions of being
spoken with reference to future litigation and give it the character of
_res gestae_ [241]. |98|
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account