The Law of Civilization and Decay: An Essay on HistoryAdams, Brooks
Philosophy
The Law of Civilization and Decay: An Essay on History
Adams, Brooks
Civilization -- History; Degeneration; History -- Philosophy
Under the Tudors commerce and industry were yet in their infancy.
Great Britain still remained substantially agricultural, and capital
primarily sought investment in land. The enclosure of the commons and
the confiscations of the monastic estates, together formed a gigantic
real estate speculation, with which faith had little to do, and which
was possible only because force began to express itself through another
type of intellect than that which had been able to defend its property
during an imaginative age.
The commercial community always demanded cheap religion. Under Henry
they inclined toward Zwingli, under Elizabeth toward Calvin, under
Charles they were Presbyterian; the gentry, on the contrary, were by
nature conservative, and favoured orthodoxy as far as their interest in
Church plunder permitted them. Henry and Norfolk stood at the head of
this class; Norfolk’s conversion to Protestantism has been explained by
Chapuys, and Henry remained a bigot to his death.
“Shortly before he died, when about to communicate, as he
always did, under one kind, he rose up from his chair, and fell
on his knees to adore the body of our Lord. The Zwinglians who
were present said that his majesty, by reason of his bodily
weakness, might make his communion sitting in his chair. The
king’s answer was, ‘If I could throw myself down, not only on
the ground, but under the ground, I should not then think that
I gave honour enough to the most Holy Sacrament.’”[240]
As to Norfolk, Chapuys has left his opinion in very plain words:--
“He [Norfolk] has a good deal changed his tune, for it was he
alone [in] the Court who showed himself the best of Catholics,
and who favoured most the authority of the pope; but he
must act in this way not to lose his remaining influence,
which apparently does not extend much further than Cromwell
wishes.”[241]
To attain their end, the rising class, at whose head these two men
stood, had to doubly despoil the Church in whose dogmas they believed.
They confiscated her lands to enrich themselves, and they suppressed
her revenues to buy the support of the traders. Finally, their lack
of physical force suggested to them the expedient of seizing on
the ecclesiastical organization and filling it with their servants,
who should teach the people the religious duty of submission to an
authority which distrusted an appeal to arms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account