The Law of Psychic Phenomena: A working hypothesis for the systematic study of hypnotism, spiritism, mental therapeutics, etc.Hudson, Thomson Jay
Philosophy
The Law of Psychic Phenomena: A working hypothesis for the systematic study of hypnotism, spiritism, mental therapeutics, etc.
Hudson, Thomson Jay
Parapsychology
_Q._ But how does wife's brain know (certain) secrets?
_A._ Wife's spirit unconsciously guides."
At a subsequent séance the following dialogue occurred:
"_Q._ By what means are (unknown) secrets conveyed to wife's brain?
_A._ What you call mesmeric influence.
_Q._ What do you mean by 'what you call'? What do _you_ call it?
_A._ Electro-biology.
_Q._ By whom, or by what, is the electro-biologic force set in
motion?
_A._ I told you you could not know more than you did.
_Q._ Can wife answer a question the reply to which I do not know?
_A._ Why do you try to make me say what I won't?
_Q._ Simply because I desire knowledge. _Why_ will you not tell?
_A._ Wife could tell if some one else, with a very strong will, in
the room knew."
These two cases clearly demonstrate the proposition that where an
operator can be found who is not dominated by the suggestion embraced
in the spiritistic hypothesis, he will not assume to be a spirit. If
he does entertain the spirit hypothesis, he _will_ assume that he is a
spirit, and answer accordingly. The mental and physical phenomena are
the same in the one case as in the other. The logical conclusion is
this: the fact that the intelligence which operates the pencil in the
one case claims that it is a disembodied spirit does not constitute
valid evidence that it is a spirit. We must look, therefore, to other
sources for evidence of spirit origin of the phenomena. Obviously the
only test by which that question can be settled is by the character of
the communications. When that test is applied, it is found that all
that is mysterious about them can be explained on the hypothesis of
telepathy or clairvoyance. In the mean time, the fact that the power
that writes is always amenable to control by suggestion, constitutes
the strongest presumptive evidence that it is the subjective mind of
the operator. This is the explanation which is afforded by a knowledge
of some of the laws governing the action of the subjective mind. The
_onus probandi_ rests with those who claim a supernatural origin for
the phenomenon.
TRANCE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account