[35: Park on Insurance; Arnold on Insurance; Gist _v_. Mason, I T. R. 84.] [36: Idem.] [37: The Immanuel, 2 Rob. Adm. Rep. 198.] [38: Park, 502; Sewell _v_. Royal Exchange Assurance Co. 4 Taunt. 856; Wilson _v_. Marryat, 8 T. Rep. 31.] [39: Willison _v_. Patterson, 7 Taunt. 439; _Vide_ Note on the War Bill Act, at the end of this part.] [40: Per Gibbs, C.J. Antoine _v._ Morshead, 6 Taunt. 238. According to Mr. Serjeant Byles, a bill drawn by a British prisoner in favour of an alien enemy cannot be enforced by the payee. He cites no case in support of this assertion; but on the principle of the last case cited, if it were drawn for _subsistence and not for trade_, there seems to be no reason why it should not be legal.] [41: Duhamel _v._ Pickering, 2 Starkie, 92.] [42: Barker _v._ Hodgson, 3 M. & S. 270.] [43: Liddard _v._ Lopes, 10 East. 526; Abbot, on Shipping, 596.] [44: 1 Kent's Com. 248; The Hiram, 3 Rob. Adm. 189.] [45: 1 Kent's Com., 249.] [46: Hadley _v._ Clarke, 8 T.R. 259; 3 Kent's Com. 249.] [47: Abbot, on Shipping, 599.] [48: Pothier, Trait du Cout. de Joc. No. 140.] [49: Story, on Partnership, pp. 447, 448.] [50: Griswold _v._ Waddington, 16 Johns. Rep. U.S.] [51: Story, on Partnership, 447.] [52: Story, on Partnership, 449; Griswold _v._ Waddington, 15 Johns, 57; 16 Johns, 438.] [53: Platt, on Covenants, 588; Doe _d._ Lord Anglesea _v._ Ch. Wardens of Rugely, 6 Q.B. 113, and cases there cited.] [54: Cosmopolite, 4 Rob. 10, 11, in note.] [55: 1 Term. R. Gist. _v._ Mason.] [56: Per Buller, J. Bell _v._ Gilson, 1 Bos. _v._. Pull.] [57: Case of Bella Guidita, cited 1 Rob. Adm. Rep. 207.] [58: 1 Kent, p. 73] [58: 1 Kent, p. 73] [59: Per Eyre, C.J. Sparenburgh _v._ Bannatyne, 1 B. & P. 168.] [60: Sparenburgh _v._ Bannatyne, 1 B. & P. 163.] [61: Maria _v_. Hall, 2 B.&P. 236.] [62: Derry _v_. Duchess of Mazarin, 1 Taunt. 147.] [63: 7 & 8 Vic. c. 66, sec. 16; Mrs. Manning's Case, 2 D.C.C. 468.] [64: The Vriendchap, 6 Rob. 166; the Embden, 1 Rob. 17; the Endraught, 1 Rob. 23.] [65: Kent's Com. vol. i. 74.] [66: Case of the Emmanuel, 1 Rob. Adm. Rep. 302.] [67: Case of Dos Hermanos, 2 Wheaton, 76.] [68: 1 Wheaton, 46; Rob. Adm, Rep. iii. 324; the Harmony, the Indian Chief, 3 Rob. 12.] [69: The Ocean, 5 Rob. p. 91.] [70: The Vigilantia, 1 Rob. Adm. Rep. p. 1.] [71: The Susa, Rob. Adm. Rep. vol. ii. p. 255.] [72: Wheaton, vol. ii. p. 71, citing Cranch's Rep. vol viii. p. 253.] [73: 1 Kent's Com. 82, citing Berens _v_. Rucker, I W. Bl. 313; and _vide infra_ Chap. iii. under title "Rule of 1756."] [74: The Vigilantia, 1 Rob. Adm. Rep. 15.] [75: The Success, I Dodson's Adm. Rep. 132.] [76: I Kent's Com., p. 85.] [77: I Kent's Com. p. 85.] [78: Vrow Margaretha, I Rob. Adm. Rep. 338.] [79: Esprit des Loix, book 15, c. 2.] [80: Vattel, Idem.] [81: Wheaton, vol. 2, p. 79.] [82: Wheaton, vol. 2, p. 8; Kent, vol. 1, p. 91.] [83: Not so, however, in the late Declaration, March 28,1854; _sed vide_ App.]