I waited more than an hour longer, and when I tumbled out with a dozen
kinds of cramps, the maternal creature was soaring serenely far up in
the clear, cool sky.
[Illustration]
XV
The Lay of the Land
SHE loved nature—from a veranda, a dog-cart, the deck of a vessel.
She had been to the seashore for a whole June, the next June to
the mountains, then a June to an inland farm. “And I enjoyed it!”
she exclaimed; “the sky-blue, I mean, the sea-blue, and the green
of the hills. But as for seeing fiddler crabs and chewinks and
woodchucks—_things_! why, I simply didn’t. In fact, I believe that
most of your fiddling crabs and moralizing stumps and philosophizing
woodchucks are simply the creatures of a disordered imagination.”
I quite agreed as to the fiddling (some of it) and the philosophizing;
I disagreed, however, as to the reality of the crabs and the
woodchucks; for it was not the attributes and powers of these creatures
that she really disbelieved in, but the very existence of the creatures
themselves,—along _her_ seashore, and upon the farm that _she_ visited.
“As for fiddler crabs and chewinks and woodchucks—_things_,” she did
not see them. Certainly not. Yet a fiddler crab is as real an entity as
a thousand-acre marsh,—and in its way as interesting. It is a sorry
soul that looks for nothing out of doors but fiddler crabs, and insists
upon their fiddling; that never sees the sky-blue, the sea-blue, and
the green of the rolling hills. I shall never forget a moonrise over
the Maurice River marshes that I witnessed one night in early June.
It was a peculiarly solemn sight, and one of the profoundly beautiful
experiences of my life, there in the wide, weird silence of the half
sea-land, with the tide at flood. Nor shall I ever forget two or three
of the stops which I made in the marshes that day to watch the fiddler
crabs. Nor shall I forget how they fiddled. For fiddle they did, just
as they used to years ago, when they and I lived on these marshes
together.
If my skeptic found no fiddler crabs along her seashore, found nothing
of interest smaller and more thing-like than color and fresh air, it
may be that she did not understand how to look for crabs and things.
To go to the seashore for one June, to the mountains for a second, to
the farm for a third, is not a good way to study the out-of-doors. A
better way is to spend all three Junes at this shore or upon this same
farm. It is when one abides upon the farm, indeed, the year around,
through several Junes, that one discovers the woodchucks. The clover is
too high in June. As one of twelve, June is a very good month to be out
of doors; but as a season for nature study,—no single month, not even
June, is satisfactory.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account