The Leading Facts of English HistoryMontgomery, D. H. (David Henry)
History
The Leading Facts of English History
Montgomery, D. H. (David Henry)
Great Britain -- History
While James was on the way from Scotland to London to receive the
crown, the Puritans presented the "Millenary Petition" to him. It was
so called because it purported to have a thousand signers. The
ministers presenting it asked that they might be permitted to preach
without wearing the white gown called a surplice, to baptize without
making the sign of the cross on the child's forehead, and to perform
the marriage ceremony without using the ring. Bishop Hooker and Lord
Bacon had pleaded for a certain degree of toleration for the Puritans.
They even quoted the words of Christ: "He that is not against us is
for us." But the King had no patience with such a plea.
418. Hampton Court Conference (1604).
The King convened a conference at Hampton Court, near London, to
consider the Petition, or rather to make a pedantic display of his
own learning. The probability that he would grant the petitioners'
request was small. James had come to England disgusted with the
violence of the Scotch Presbyterians or Puritans (S378), especially
since Andrew Melville, one of their leading ministers in Edinburgh,
had seized his sleeve at a public meeting and addressed him, with a
somewhat brutal excess of truth, as "God's silly vassal."[1]
[1] Gardiner in the "Dictionary of National (British) Biography,"
"James I," thinks that by "silly" Melville meant "weak." But that is
not much improvement.
But the new sovereign had a still deeper reason for his antipathy to
the Puritans. He saw that their doctrine of equality in the Church
naturally led to that equality in the State. If they objected to
Episcopal government in the one, might they not presently object to
royal government in the other? Hence to all their arguments he
answered with his favorite maxim, "No bishop, no king," meaning that
the two must stand or fall together.
At the Hampton Court Conference all real freedom of discussion was
practically prohibited. The Conference, however, had one good result,
for the King ordered a new and revised translation of the Bible to be
made (SS254, 357). It was published a few years later (1611). This
translation of the Scriptures excels all others in simplicity,
dignity, and beauty of language. After more than three hundred years
it still remains the version used in the great majority of Protestant
churches and Protestant homes wherever English is spoken.
James regarded the Conference as a success. He had refuted the
Puritans, as he believed, with much Latin and some Greek. He ended by
declaiming against them with such unction that one enthusiastic bishop
declared that his Majesty must be specially inspired by the Holy
Ghost!
He closed the meeting by imprisoning the ten persons who had presented
the petition, on the ground that it tended to sedition and rebellion.
Henceforth, the King's attitude toward the Puritans (S378) was
unmistakable. "I will make them conform," said he, "or I will harry
them out of the land" (S422).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account