The Lenâpé and Their Legends: With the complete text and symbols of the Walam olum, a new translation, and an inquiry into its authenticityBrinton, Daniel G. (Daniel Garrison)
History
The Lenâpé and Their Legends: With the complete text and symbols of the Walam olum, a new translation, and an inquiry into its authenticity
Brinton, Daniel G. (Daniel Garrison)
Delaware Indians; Delaware language -- Texts; Picture-writing, Indian
The Rev. Mr. Heckewelder was of opinion that _Talligewi_ was a word
foreign to the Algonkin, a _nomen gentile_ of another tribe, adopted
by the Delawares, just as they adopted _Mengwe_ for the Iroquois from
the Onondaga _Yenkwe_, men (see above, page 14). It is not necessarily
connected with Alleghany, which may be pure Algonkin. He says, "Those
people called themselves _Talligeu_ or _Talligewi_." (_Indian Nations_
p. 48.) The accent, as he gives it, _Tallige'wi_, shows that the
word is, _Talliké_, with the substantive verb termination, so that
_Talligewi_ means, "He is a _Talliké_" or, "It is of (belongs to) the
Talliké."
This appears to me the most probable supposition of any I have quoted,
and it reduces our quest to that of a nation who called themselves
by a name which, to Lenape ears, would sound like _Talliké_. Such a
nation presents itself at once in the Cherokees, who call themselves
_Tsa'laki_. Moreover, they fill the requirements in other particulars.
Their ancient traditions assign them a residence precisely where the
Delaware legends locate the Tallike, to wit, on the upper waters of
the Ohio (see above, page 17). Fragments of them continued there until
within the historic period, and the persistent hostility between them
and the Delawares points to some ancient and important contest.
Name, location and legends, therefore, combine to identify the
Cherokees or Tsalaki with the Tallike, and this is as much evidence
as we can expect to produce in such researches. I can see no reason
whatever for Dr. Shea's opinion that the Lenape "in their progress
eastward drove out of Ohio the Quappas, called by the Algonkins,
Alkanzas or Alligewi, who retreated down the Ohio and Mississippi."
(Shea, Notes to Alsop's _Maryland_, p. 118.)
The question remains, whether the Tallike were the "Mound Builders."
It is not so stated in the WALUM OLUM. The inference rather is that
the "Snake people," _Akowini_ or _Akonapi_, dwelt in the river valleys
north of the Ohio river, in the area of Western Ohio and Indiana, where
the most important earthworks are found--and singularly enough none
more remarkable than the immense effigy of the serpent in Adams County,
Ohio, which winds its gigantic coils over 700 feet in length on the
summit of a bold bluff overlooking Brush Creek.
According to the RED SCORE, the Snake people were conquered by the
Algonkins long before the contest with the Tallike began. These latter
lay between the position then occupied by the Lenape and the eastern
territory where they were found by the whites. In other words, the
Tallike were on the Upper Ohio and its tributaries, and they had to be
driven south before the path across the mountains was open. For this
reason they are called _wapawullaton_, "possessing the East," that is,
with reference to the then position of the Lenape in southwestern Ohio.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account