These linguistic traits, common to the whole stock, I may briefly enumerate as follows:-- 1. All words are derived from simple, monosyllabic roots, by means of affixes and suffixes. 2. The words do not come within the grammatical categories of the Aryan language, as nouns, adjectives, verbs and other "parts of speech," but are "indifferent themes," which may be used at will as one or the other. To this there appear to be a few exceptions. 3. Expressions of being (_i.e._, nominal themes) undergo modifications depending on the ontological conception as to whether the thing spoken of is a living or a lifeless object. This forms the "animate and inanimate," or the "noble and ignoble" declensions and conjugations. The distinction is not strictly logical, but largely grammatical, many lifeless objects being considered living, and the reverse. This is the only modification of the kind known, true grammatical gender not appearing in any of these tongues. 4. Expressions of action (_i. e._, verbal themes) undergo modifications depending on the abstract assumption as to whether the action is real or conjectural. If the latter, it is indicated by a change in the vowel of the root. This leads to a fundamental division of verbal modes into _positive_ and _suppositive_ modes. 5. The expression of action is subordinate to that of being, so that the verbal elements of a proposition are secondary to the nominal or pronominal elements, and the subjective relation becomes closely akin to, or identical with, that of possession.[157] 6. The conception of number is feebly developed in its application to inanimate objects, which often have no grammatical plurals. The inclusive and exclusive plurals are used in the first person. 7. The genius of the language is _holophrastic_--that is, its effort is to express the relationship of several ideas by combining them in one word. This is displayed: 1, in nominal themes, by _polysynthesis_, by which several such themes are welded into one, according to fixed laws of elision and euphony; and 2, by _incorporation_, where the object (or a pronoun representing it) and the subject are united with the verb, forming the so-called "transitions," or "objective conjugations." 8. There is no relative pronoun, so that the relation of minor to major clauses is left to be indicated either by position or the offices of a simple connective. 9. The language of both sexes is identical, those differences of speech between the males and females, so frequently observed in other American tongues, finding no place in the Algonkin. 10. No independent verb-substantive is found, and, as might be anticipated, no means of predicating existence apart from quality and attribute. § 3. _Dialects of the Lenape._