“I plied her with all those arguments,” replied la Peyrade; “but I
couldn’t move her resolution. Don’t you see, my dear democrats, you
stirred up the revolution of ‘89; you thought to make a fine speculation
in dethroning the noble by the bourgeois, and the end of it is you are
shoved out yourselves. This looks like paradox; but you’ve found out now
that the peasant and clodhopper isn’t malleable; he can’t be forced
down and kept under like the noble. The aristocracy, on behalf of
its dignity, would not condescend to common cares, and was therefore
dependent on a crowd of plebeian servitors to whom it had to trust for
three-fourths of the actions of its own life. That was the reign of
stewards and bailiffs, wily fellows, into whose hands the interests of
the great families passed, and who fed and grew fat on the parings of
the great fortunes they managed. But now-a-days, utilitarian theories,
as they call them, have come to the fore,--‘We are never so well served
as by ourselves,’ ‘There’s no shame in attending to one’s own business,’
and many other bourgeois maxims which have suppressed the role of
intermediaries. Why shouldn’t Mademoiselle Brigitte Thuillier manage her
own house when dukes and peers go in person to the Bourse, where such
men sign their own leases and read the deeds before they sign them, and
go themselves to the notary, whom, in former days, they considered a
servant.”
During this time Cerizet had time to recover from the blow he had just
received squarely in the face, and to think of the transition he had
to make from one set of interests to the other, of which he was now the
agent.
“What you are declaiming there is all very clever,” he said, carelessly,
“but the thing that proves to me our defeat is the fact that you are not
on the terms with Mademoiselle Thuillier you would have us believe
you are. She is slipping through your fingers; and I don’t think that
marriage is anything like as certain as Dutocq and I have been fancying
it was.”
“Well, no doubt,” said la Peyrade, “there are still some touches to be
given to our sketch, but I believe it is well under way.”
“And I think, on the contrary, that you have lost ground; and the reason
is simple: you have done those people an immense service; and that’s a
thing never forgiven.”
“Well, we shall see,” said la Peyrade. “I have more than one hold upon
them.”
“No, you are mistaken. You thought you did a brilliant thing in putting
them on a pinnacle, but the fact is you emancipated them; they’ll keep
you now at heel. The human heart, particularly the bourgeois heart, is
made that way. If I were in your place I shouldn’t feel so sure of being
on solid ground, and if something else turned up that offered me a good
chance--”
“What! just because I couldn’t get you the lease of that house do you
want to knock everything to pieces?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account