The Letters of Cassiodorus: Being a Condensed Translation of the Variae Epistolae of Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus SenatorCassiodorus, Senator
History
The Letters of Cassiodorus: Being a Condensed Translation of the Variae Epistolae of Magnus Aurelius Cassiodorus Senator
Cassiodorus, Senator
Goths -- Italy; Italy -- History -- 476-1268
The work from which these 'Excerpta' are taken was composed, according
to Usener, in the year 522. This is proved by the facts that the
receiver of the letter is spoken of as Magister Officiorum, a post
which he apparently held from Sept. 1, 521, to Sept. 1, 522; and that
the Consulship of the two sons of Boethius, which began on Jan. 1,
522, is also referred to. The name of the person to whom the letter is
addressed is given as Rufius Petronius Nicomachus. Usener, however,
shows good reason for thinking that his final name, the name by which
he was known in the consular lists, is omitted, and that his full
designation was Rufius Petronius Nicomachus Cethegus, Consul in 504,
Magister Officiorum (as above stated) in 521-522, and Patrician. He
was probably the same Cethegus whom Procopius mentions[100] as
Princeps Senatus, and as withdrawing from Rome to Centumcellae in the
year 545 because he was accused of treachery to the Imperial
cause[101].
[Footnote 100: De Bello Gotthico iii. 13 (p. 328, ed. Bonn).]
[Footnote 101: If Usener be right (and he has worked up this point
with great care), we can trace the following links in the pedigree of
Cethegus (see pp. 6 and 11):
Rufius Petronius _Placidus_, Consul 481.
|
Rufius Petronius Anicius _Probinus_, Consul 489.
|
Rufius Petronius Nicomachus _Cethegus_, Consul 504, correspondent of
Cassiodorus.
Probinus and Cethegus are referred to by Ennodius in his letter to
Ambrosius and Beatus, otherwise called his Paraenesis (p. 409, ed.
Hartel).]
[Sidenote: Its object.]
The object of the little treatise referred to evidently was to give an
account of those members of the family to which Cassiodorus belonged
who had distinguished themselves in literature. The words 'Ex genere
Cassiodororum' are perhaps a gloss of the transcribers. At least it
does not appear that they would correctly describe the descent of
Symmachus and Boethius, though they were relations of Cassiodorus,
being descended from or allied to the great house of the Aurelii from
which he also sprang. Probably several other names may have been
noticed in the original treatise, but the only three as to which the
'Anecdoton' informs us are the three as to whom information is most
acceptable--Symmachus, Boethius, and Cassiodorus himself.
[Sidenote: Information as to life of Symmachus.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account