Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
I am strong with you in my admiration for Burke. I repeat for the
eleventh time, I wish I could be in New York to talk to him, especially
lately do I feel an intense need for contact and conversation with the
right sort of people. I have rather missed Lescaze’s stimulation since
he left, while Loveman, the only other person left here, becomes more
incoherent every day. I am, really, suffering a great deal these days,
and the worst is that I have almost no impulse toward writing. This
wholesale “fertilization” of America by such half-baked people as the
Algonquin gang is one of the most depressing features of all, because it
is without any sense of values. Ben Hecht and Eliot get equal honors in
such company. But at any rate I can rival you in some ways. Where you
have Untermeyer, I can trot out Braithwaite. A letter from Braithwaite
came last week inviting or rather soliciting my “Praise for an Urn” for
the 1922 _Anthology_. At last I shall rub shoulders with Florence [sic]
Wilkinson!
Allen Tate was a week later than expected in getting to N. Y., but you
have probably met him by this time. I am rather looking forward to his
two days here--he has enthusiasm and brains, however, undeveloped his
style may be. Matty’s trans. from Soupault in the last _Broom_ are
undoubtedly clever, but I don’t see how he can rave so about this man’s
conceptions. Matty mentions his recent love for Francis Jammes and
Vielé-Griffin, the latter as being much abler than Laforgue. Where is he
headed for, anyway? His Joyce article was amazing in its lack of
recognition of the great elements in Joyce. I look forward to his final
suicide with Frank. But, after all,--Matty will always keep his head up,
and sniff ominously. --/--/
117: TO GORHAM MUNSON
[_Cleveland_] _Nov. 20th, ’22_
Dear Gorham: I am immersed totally in a rush job and will be for a week
or so more. These campaigns are taxing affairs and very confining, so I
can’t write much. But I do want to assure you of my enthusiastic desire
to both write the jacket for your _Frank Study_ and also write a
communication to the Double Skull[24] (delightful name) about it. As
regards the latter,--it will necessarily be very short, as they once
returned a reasonably-sized review I had written on Shaw’s _Back to
Methuselah_ on the argument that it was too long for the comparative
importance of the book! Please send me the proofs as soon as they are
out and I’ll begin.
I hope you enjoyed -- -- -- --. I took the liberty of writing him to look
you up because you had once mentioned a certain interest in him incurred
in Pollard’s _Their Day in Court_. -- -- -- -- is delightful company,
whether he goes in for post-Beardsley attitudes or not. The episodes of
the _Satyricon_ are mild as compared to his usual exploits in N. Y.
during vacations. --/--/
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account