Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
I, too, think I made my visit at just the proper time. I’ll never forget
how really eloquently Grandma looked, how intelligent and fresh. And
_you_ looked so good to me, too. Remember, that suffering does, if borne
without rancour, it does build something that only grows lovelier with
time--and it is a kind of kingdom among those _initiated_, a kingdom
that has the widest kind of communion. You and I can share our
understanding of things more and more as time goes on. I loved you _so
much_ for many of the things you said when I was with you.
Yes, I hope you never will turn your back on me, as you say. And this is
not to say that there may come occasions for it--but there may, after
all, be times of temporary misunderstandings as there have been before.
I can be awfully proud of _you_, however less occasion I may [have] to
feel similarly about myself. I do some awfully silly things
sometimes--most of which you don’t know about, but which I sometimes
(not always) regret. Don’t let this stir your apprehensions, any,
however. I’m in no particular pickle at present.
We have had another snow and I’m just disgusted. I had counted on a
modified weather on my return and instead it’s been just one snow flurry
after another. Sore throat is some better, but I’m still threatened with
tonsilitis. No chance to start gardens yet. -- -- -- --
239: TO GORHAM MUNSON
_Patterson_ _April 5_
Dear Gorham: It seems evident that I somewhat too egoistically argued
what I intended as simply a defense of the position and province of
poetry, as an art form, rather than any claims my work might or might
not have to critical praise. This has been my attitude throughout our
discussion, and though certain contentions are still unresolved, it
doesn’t in the least conflict with what you say in your last letter.
Indeed, I should say that your essay rather over-estimates my
achievements in some particulars. Please don’t think me ungrateful or
disgruntled, anyway.
Rorty was so swift in returning Allen’s NOTE that I have been wondering
if he had actually taken some interest in the “Voyages” I sent you. I
should have sent them direct to him had I known that he was subsequently
to write me a request for something. Sheer inadvertency on my part not
to have mentioned my intentions in sending them to you. Allen gave
Untermeyer and Kreymborg such digs that it’s not surprising that Rorty
summarily returned the mss. I shall be surprised if he fancies my work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account