Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
and satire of this kind of theme depends on a continued heaping-up and
heaping-up of absurd detail, etc., until a climacteric of either
bitterness or farce is reached. For example,--have you read Gogol’s “The
Cloak,” ever? I don’t know what Hervey White did to it,--but I would
mistrust him of any improvement on it after reading his comments on
Frank’s _Our America_. -- -- -- -- I am as anti-Semitic as they make ’em,
but Frank’s comments cannot afford to be ignored merely because of race
prejudice. White is just an ordinary ass, though, and can easily be
disposed of. I don’t understand, though, how you can consent to such
“alterations” in your mss.
I’m very glad you sent the poem. It begins well,--dramatically, and
maintains itself well until the last two lines. They are an appendix
which I’d remove--merely repetition of better phrases in the beginning.
Why not divide up the second verse into two equal parts and have three
quartet-line verses? Another thing,--the “shoot-the-chutes” image
jars,--one wants to laugh,--and one shouldn’t--something else there
would be better. Also, why use a French title? I know it’s “done in the
best families,” but there seems a touch of servility,--inadequacy about
it to me. I’d send it to _The Dial_ if I had it, and be quite proud of
it whether taken or not.
Josephson writes me that _The Dial_ is causing a great stir, but that
clique favoritism, the old familiar and usual magazine button, is
beginning to become evident. J’s letters are charming, and a recent love
affair of his, a disappointment, has added seasoning to his
observations. I only hope that you, he, and Anderson continue to keep me
awake [?] with occasional mail.
I had a long and hypocritical conference with my father today, and
succeeded to the extent of a five dollar per week raise in salary,--this
makes existence at least possible.
I don’t know, G., whether I’m strong and hardened or not. I know that I
am forced to be very flexible to get along at all under present
conditions. I contrive to humanize my work to some extent by much
camaraderie with the other employees and this is my salvation there. Of
course I am utterly alone,--want to be,--and am beginning to rather
enjoy the slippery scales-of-the-fish, continual escape, attitude. The
few people that I can give myself to are out of physical reach, and so I
can only write where I would like to talk, gesture, and dine. The most
revolting sensation I experience is the feeling of having placed myself
in a position of quiescence or momentary surrender to the contact &
possession of the insensitive fingers of my neighbors here. I am
learning, just beginning to learn,--the technique of escape, and too
often yet, I betray myself by some enthusiasm or other.
My Akron friend has not been able to see me for some five [?] weeks, and
I am in need of a balm, spiritual and fleshly. I hope next Sunday
something can be arranged. -- -- -- --
40: TO MATTHEW JOSEPHSON
_Cleveland_ _March 15th --’20_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account