Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
I have written Margaret Anderson to find out the _L.R._ situation.
Probably what you have heard is only too true. There is no use
expressing familiar resentments about such proceedings, and anyway one
grows rather calloused and numb in time. There is that danger with
me,--of relaxing into an indifference more comfortable than an interest
in the arts nowadays and here, allows. I suppose the Minns pictures, my
poems, etc., are smothered,--at least I’ve reconciled myself to it
peacefully. I’m sorrier about the Minns pictures than anything else, as
it meant a great deal of trouble to bring their reproduction about.
Perhaps they’ll print them again, I don’t know yet. My great wonder is
that M.C.A. and j.h. keep persisting as they do.
When you get a chance see the new monograph on Jacob Epstein including
fifty photos of his works. He seems to be much better than most of
Rodin, and I’m enthusiastic almost to the point of silliness. I’m
reading _The Possessed_ at your suggestion. Dostoievsky is a stranger to
me beyond _Crime and Punishment_ which caught me by the throat. He
_does_ give one more life than my mundane world supplies,--and
stimulates. He makes you forget yourself (should I better say, lose) in
the life of his characters for days at a time. And how few writers can
do that! You see this record of my temper at present,--I’m tired, with
every evidence of it. -- -- -- --
52: TO GORHAM MUNSON
[_Cleveland_] _11/23/20_
My dear Gorham: Your letter has just come, and I’m sorry to know you are
having such an ordeal of “nerves.” Of course, being thrown back
violently again on celibacy after your Woodstock freedom would naturally
tend to bring about such a result, and it is only a pity that you cannot
find anything near you of sufficient temporary interest to relieve your
situation. Of course, I realize, that the puritanical taboos of a
typical boys’ school are what stands in the way most of all, and then
you might possibly resent and refuse sheer sensuality after having
experienced what I imagine has been offered you. I don’t believe in the
“sublimation” theory at all so far as it applies to my own experience.
Beauty has most often appeared to me in moments of penitence and even
sometimes, distraction and worry. Lately my continence has brought me
nothing in the creative way,--it has tended to create a confidence in me
along lines of action,--business, execution, etc. There is not love
enough in me at present to do a thing. This sounds romantic and
silly,--you understand that I mean and refer to the strongest incentive
to the imagination, or, at least, the strongest in my particular case.
So I have nothing to offer you for reading and judgment. Mart Anderson
writes me that the next _L.R._ will be out the twenty-fifth,--96 pgs.,
and will contain my poem, etc., and a publication of the J. Joyce trial
and proceedings which she says are interesting. It ought to be a rich
number with John Quinn and Burleson throwing epithets at each other. I
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account