Authors, American -- 20th century -- Correspondence; Crane, Hart, 1899-1932. Correspondence
No one will especially appreciate it -- -- -- --. By all this you must not
think that I have joined the Right Wing to such an extent that I am
rollicking in F. Scott Fitzgerald. No,--but by the straight and narrow
path swinging to the south of the village DADA I have arrived at a
somewhat and abashed posture of reverence before the statues of Ben
Jonson, Michael Drayton, Chaucer, sundry others already mentioned. The
precious rages of dear Matty [Josephson] somehow don’t seem to swerve me
from this position. He is, it strikes me, altogether unsteady. Of
course, since Mallarmé and Huysmans were elegant weepers it is up to the
following generation to haw-haw gloriously! Even dear old Buddha-face de
Gourmont is passé. Well, I suppose it is up to one in Paris to do as the
Romans do, but it all looks too easy to me from Cleveland, Cuyhoga
County, God’s country. But Matty will always glitter when he walks
provided the man in front of him has not sparkled,--which we hope he
never does, of course,--and so I am happy to hear from him always about
his latest change of mind. Quite seriously Matty is thrilling, in prose
especially. His performance is always agreeable despite my inability to
sympathize with his theories. Paris seems to be a good place for him to
work and I suppose he will stay there at least until his contes are
published. --/--/
87: TO WILLIAM WRIGHT
_Cleveland, O._ _February 11, 1922_
Dear Bill: Don’t let me keep on worrying. Your visit was a great
pleasure to me, resulting in the renewal of old contacts and the
discoveries of many new ones. I am so much interested in you now, that I
am in danger of pestering you with all kinds of advice and admonitions.
One of these is: not to let the caprices of any unmellow ladies result
in your unbalance or extreme discomfiture. Even the best of them, at
times, know not and care not what they do. They have the faculty of
producing very debilitating and thoroughly unprofitable effects on
gentlemen who put themselves too much in their hands. Woman was not
meant to occupy this position. It was only the Roman Catholic Church who
gave it to her. Greeks, Romans, and Egyptians knew better how to handle
her. I suggest your reading De Gourmont’s _Virgin Heart_ for a delicate
dissection of this kind of problem. De Gourmont was something more than
a purely “literary critic,” you know. He was one of the most thorough
students of physiology and psychology of the modern world. He was an
adept scientist of the emotions. Stendhal was another, but less clear.
All this suffering is quite romantic and beautiful, you know, but you
pay a stupid price for it. I can’t help saying these things because of
my interest and because I saw you go away in ominous style. I hope you
haven’t been ill, and that you have merely forgotten to write me.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account