The Letters of Robert Louis Stevenson — Volume 1Stevenson, Robert Louis
General
The Letters of Robert Louis Stevenson — Volume 1
Stevenson, Robert Louis
Authors, Scottish -- 19th century -- Correspondence; Stevenson, Robert Louis, 1850-1894 -- Correspondence
Symonds was actually dining with us when your letter came, and I
communicated your remarks. . . . He is a far better and more interesting
thing than any of his books.
The Elephant was my wife’s; so she is proportionately elate you should
have picked it out for praise—from a collection, let me add, so replete
with the highest qualities of art.
My wicked carcase, as John Knox calls it, holds together wonderfully. In
addition to many other things, and a volume of travel, I find I have
written, since December, 90 _Cornhill_ pages of magazine work—essays and
stories: 40,000 words, and I am none the worse—I am the better. I begin
to hope I may, if not outlive this wolverine upon my shoulders, at least
carry him bravely like Symonds and Alexander Pope. I begin to take a
pride in that hope.
I shall be much interested to see your criticisms; you might perhaps send
them to me. I believe you know that is not dangerous; one folly I have
not—I am not touchy under criticism.
Lloyd and my wife both beg to be remembered; and Lloyd sends as a present
a work of his own. I hope you feel flattered; for this is _simply the
first time he has ever given one away_. I have to buy my own works, I
can tell you.—Yours very sincerely,
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON.
TO W. E. HENLEY
[_Chalet am Stein_, _Davos_, _April_ 1882.]
MY DEAR HENLEY,—I hope and hope for a long letter—soon I hope to be
superseded by long talks—and it comes not. I remember I have never
formally thanked you for that hundred quid, nor in general for the
introduction to Chatto and Windus, and continue to bury you in copy as if
you were my private secretary. Well, I am not unconscious of it all; but
I think least said is often best, generally best; gratitude is a tedious
sentiment, it’s not ductile, not dramatic.
If Chatto should take both, _cui dedicare_? I am running out of
dedikees; if I do, the whole fun of writing is stranded. _Treasure
Island_, if it comes out, and I mean it shall, of course goes to Lloyd.
Lemme see, I have now dedicated to
W. E. H. [William Ernest Henley].
S. C. [Sidney Colvin].
T. S. [Thomas Stevenson].
Simp. [Sir Walter Simpson].
There remain: C. B., the Williamses—you know they were the parties who
stuck up for us about our marriage, and Mrs. W. was my guardian angel,
and our Best Man and Bridesmaid rolled in one, and the only third of the
wedding party—my sister-in-law, who is booked for _Prince Otto_—Jenkin I
suppose sometime—George Meredith, the only man of genius of my
acquaintance, and then I believe I’ll have to take to the dead, the
immortal memory business.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account