The Library of Entertainment: HandbookScammell, John Chilton
General
The Library of Entertainment: Handbook
Scammell, John Chilton
Literature -- Collections
7. Did Socrates practise what he preached?
8. How do the teachings of Socrates compare with those of
Christianity?
9. What is the fundamental difference, in your understanding,
between philosophy and religion?
10. Did Socrates believe in one God or in many?
FOR REFERENCE
"Plato" ("The World's Epoch-Makers").--RITCHIE.
"Dialogues," translated by JOWETT.
"Plato the Teacher."--BRYAN.
"Representative Men."--EMERSON.
"The Myths of Plato."--STEWART.
"Plato's Republic" ("Historical and Critical Essays").--DE
QUINCEY.
AURELIUS
(121 A.D.-180 A.D.)
Marcus Aurelius (Antoninus), emperor and philosopher, was the child
of noble parents. His wonderful character, both intellectual and
moral, early attracted the attention of the emperor, Hadrian, who,
when Marcus had attained his seventeenth year, adopted Antoninus Pius
as his successor, upon the condition that the latter adopt Marcus.
Accordingly Marcus was adopted by Pius, who proceeded to lavish upon
him as heir presumptive to the Empire every position for which his
high character and thorough education fitted him; and upon the death
of Pius he ascended the throne, at the age of forty.
His reign covered a period of nineteen years, over two-thirds of
which he spent on the borders of the empire in ceaseless struggles
to sustain the tottering empire against the ravages of the outer
barbarians.
It was during these campaigns that his "Meditations," or "Thoughts,"
his only work, was written. In its present form, at least, it was
never intended for publication, nor is it probable that it was, as
some think, written for the instruction of his son, Commodus. It
was written in Greek, and consists of mere memoranda, disconnected
thoughts, and confessions, evidently hastily noted, a circumstance
which accounts for its repetitions, its obscurity, and its elliptical
form of expression. But in spite of this it has been an inspiration
to the despondent in all ages. Its tone and temper are sweet yet
dignified, courageous yet resigned, philosophical and speculative yet
intensely practical. It stands preëminent among those world-books
which teach men how to live and how to die.
The great blots on his memory, in popular estimation, are the
massacres of Christians in his reign, and his blindness to the
frailty of his wife and the worthlessness of his son. But the
Christians were in those days commonly looked upon as a pernicious
secret cult, and those who comprehend his philosophy will know why he
could see only good in the members of his family.
THE MAN
1. What circumstance illustrates the great value he set upon time?
2. Was he considered a man of letters by his contemporaries?
3. What two others deserve to be remembered with him as Roman
stoics? V, 90; X, 419.
4. Why would one hardly expect to find a great philosopher in
Marcus Aurelius?
5. Under what circumstances did he become Emperor of Rome?
6. How were his early years spent?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account