The Library of Entertainment: HandbookScammell, John Chilton
General
The Library of Entertainment: Handbook
Scammell, John Chilton
Literature -- Collections
3. =His life and immediate surroundings.= Equally significant are
the social conditions in which a man is reared, whether noble,
like Byron, or poor, like Burns; well-educated, like Macaulay, or
self-taught, like Bunyan; unfortunate and dissipated, like Poe, or
fortunate and happy, like Holmes. These facts all have a direct
bearing on the view we must take of the man's productions. Joel
Chandler Harris could never have written his amusing "Uncle Remus"
stories, if he had not spent his boyhood on a Southern plantation.
De Quincey would never have written "Our Ladies of Sorrow" if he had
not been the slave of opium. Stevenson's "Travels With a Donkey," one
of his most charming books, is due to the fact that his consumptive
tendencies compelled him to go on a walking trip in the pure and
bracing air of the mountains of southern France.
II. A second group of facts deals with the work itself.
1. =The form=; poetry, fiction, history, essay, drama, etc. (These
are discussed on p. 36 ff.)
2. =The style.= The worth of the author's work as a piece of
composition is best decided by observing the following elements,
which taken all together make up the style and quality of his writing.
What =words= does he use? Are they commonplace or do they express his
exact meaning? Are they simple, or unusual and even unintelligible?
Are they forceful or weak? etc.
How are his =sentences= constructed? Are they straightforward or
confused? Do they express a simple, direct thought or do they contain
several ideas? If complex and lengthy, are they still powerful? etc.
Are his =paragraphs= unified; that is, do they contain one leading
idea? Do they follow in systematic order, leading from one to the
other? Is the development of the author's subject easily followed?
etc.
Are the =scenes= and =characters=, the =plots= and =purposes= clearly
shown? Does it require more than one reading to find out what the
writer is trying to say? Is his work convincing? Do the characters
change, and if so, is the change natural or does it seem unreal and
artificial? Are the incidents natural or do some of the events seem
forced? If the latter, do you think the author is justified? What
is the author's aim? Has he any further purpose than that which is
immediately evident? etc.
What is the =tone= of his work? Realism? Imagination? Mystery? Charm?
Beauty? Accuracy? Delicacy? Pathos? Humor? Joy? Sarcasm? etc.
3. =The effect.= What are =your feelings= regarding the work? Do you
like it or dislike it? Why?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account